2006-06-08 19:05:16 · 10 answers · asked by having too much fun 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Although my wife's father did performed fuel calculations for the original Apollo landing, I'll spare you that speech. Instead, I will encourage you to watch two programs. The first show is called Conspiracy Moon Landing that it currently showing on the National Geographic Channel and it pretty much obliterates all of the popular conspiracy theories.
I would also encourage you to watch a movie called Capricorn One. Made it 1978, it is a fictional movie about a fake mission to mars. Although it is a science fiction story, it is a good example of how utterly impossible it would be to fake a moon landing for any length of time.
12 men walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972 and we simply have neither the resources nor the technology to pull off that big of a hoax for so long. Hundreds of thousands of people have worked on the space program. It would be far easier to put someone on the moon than to try and fake it and keep it secret for nearly 40 years.
The landings came at a time when our space program was ultra competitive with the former Soviet Union. Remember how big of a deal it was when Sputnik was put into orbit? The Soviet Union and East Germany had the technology to monitor our moon shots and transmissions. Don't you think they would have called is out if they have evidence that it was all fake?
Perhaps the most definitive proof of our trips to the moon is what we left behind. For the last 30+ years, scientists have been beaming lasers to the moon and measuring the return times. How are they doing this? Because the beams are reflected back by equipment left on the moon in 3 different locations on 3 different trips.
Case closed.
2006-06-11 15:43:36 · answer #1 · answered by Carl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pretty sure we actually went to the moon, but if it was just a wag the dog thing, that would be so rad!
have a great day!
2006-06-08 19:09:22 · answer #2 · answered by Chewy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dogs certainly cross extra via the tone of our voices than the specific phrases. Dogs growl while they're afraid and would possibly chunk. We can *instruct* puppies what a few phrases imply by way of the system of coaching. Otherwise, they do not realize our phrases however then so few folks realize puppies' frame language.
2016-09-08 22:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there are lots of things in the vid that would prove otherwise like the flag blowing in the wind (I believe that there is no wind on the moon) shadows going in different directions and like you said the lack of a crater on the surface that should have been caused by the engines back-blast.
2006-06-08 19:22:44 · answer #4 · answered by Oki Bound 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really did go to the moon.
Friends of mine at church worked for NASA as aeronautical engineers the days it was up and went up.
And they were there when the module splashed down.
Go to Kennedy Space Center yourself and look at all the surviving spacecraft and moon rocks.
2006-06-08 19:14:04 · answer #5 · answered by doublewidemama 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, how did you guess? Yep, wag the dog, that's it. But how did you know, who leaked this? Was it the dog?
2006-06-08 19:09:08 · answer #6 · answered by valcus43 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i like to wag my dog,flog the dolphin whatever ya wanna calll it ha-ha-ha!
2006-06-08 19:13:51 · answer #7 · answered by kingmikezilla@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course we did! Where on the planet were you? Under a rock? Sheez. It was so f**kin' exciting, too!
2006-06-08 19:08:30 · answer #8 · answered by HisChamp1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, how did that flag blow in the 'wind' like that? And why was there no crater caused by their 'takeoff'?
2006-06-08 19:09:01 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no we didnt go to the moon.it was all a hoak.
2006-06-08 19:14:10 · answer #10 · answered by atahsina 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋