It's nothing more then a fad. You know what I mean, like driving a SUV with gasoline at $3.00 a gallon..... Nobody is saying that Neocons are intelligent but them.
2006-06-09 12:31:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
1⤋
Clinton was instrumental in changing the sense of moral values in the country, and not for the good. His sense that everything is okay, and sex isn't sex, lead to a general laxness in morals that has led to all the things that conservatives dislike.
The impression that he was a Republican is due to the Republican Congress he faced during his administration. He couldn't get any liberal agenda passed on his own, so he had to compromise so he would not seem like a totally worthless President (such as Jimmy Carter). Given the opportunity to have a Democratic Congress, who knows what would have happened.
2006-06-08 16:31:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Karl the Webmaster 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really did and still do like Bill Clinton. He was one of the smartest and coolest presidents ever. But I wasn't thrilled at the fact of him committing adultery. He knew how to keep the peace, at least with the other countries anyway. I can't say much on peace as far as the women was concern ed.
2006-06-08 16:27:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosie24501 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well there are a few things I hated about Clinton (but I really don't like any politician) thing things I didn't like include:
Total failure in Somalia
AWB (if it looks scary its banned, had nothing to do with how it worked)
People that had dirt on them just kinda die in plain crashes and the such.
gave nuke tech to little Kim over in Korea
seams to be viewed as a good president mainly because of the tech bubble
there are more but I am at work and tired so I don't have it all here.
2006-06-08 16:28:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because of the way they left the White House before Dubya moved in (removing all of the Ws from the keyboards and stealing everything that wasn't nailed down) and because of the Whitewater scandal and because of Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky etc. etc and for making the U.S. look like Europe's retarded cousin.
2006-06-08 16:26:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by jwurz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you think Clinton was a Republican from your perspective, just how far are you too the left? Lenin left? You'd have to be really far to the left to have a perspective like that. I suppose everything looks right from that view.
2pts.
2006-06-08 16:38:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by robling_dwrdesign 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's an interesting question and contention. I often wonder the inverse about Richard Nixon. I guess both Reps and Dems need scapegoats and punching bags.
2006-06-08 16:25:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because pea brains who can't think for themselves take rhetoric and partisan propaganda as fact. There as just as many fools on the liberal side who are just as dumb who hate any republican government official.
2006-06-08 16:26:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by alieneddiexxx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
why did liberals say they want to put a bullet in Bushes forehead, how disrespectful was that...but to answer you question, maybe because he reduced our military and let bin la din go when he had the chance to catch him...
2006-06-08 16:23:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by turntable 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bill "The Pervert" went strictly by polls, he never had an idea of his own.
2006-06-08 16:26:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mr.Wise 6
·
0⤊
0⤋