If Bush lied about WMD'S did other Lie too?

Question

Bill Clinton said in 1996, 97, 98,99 00 that Iraq had WMD's so did, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, John Edwards, Ted Kennedy the nations of England, Spain, Germany, Italy, Iran, Russia, France, Canada. So the question is: Did these people and nations lie too..or just President Bush.
Remember the Clintons said Iraq had WMD's before Bush took office. So for the slow people once again: DID the OTHER people and Nation also LIE?
DO you understand the question? If you want to rant go answer other questions...stay on track!!

shocktrooper: Shaky evidence???? Whjat about over 70 Iraqi scientist who fled Iraq and said YES he (Saddam) has them..WE (Scientist) worked on them. Give me 6 Month's and a land space of California and I could ride almost anything or move it

FOR the SLOW PEOPLE: The QUESTION IS..Did other Lie too?????
It's VERY simple: ONE more time!!

Did other's LIE too????????

Answer 1

No rant here my friend, I get it, As a former Marine, trust me, I get it. Too bad all the other morons don't. Your common sense and intelligence makes me proud! Semper Fi.

Answer 2

first off basic english is a must I feel in this forum... let me help you, did the others... s it is a letter that needs to go after r... anyhow they are all liars (Politicians) what else did you expect. Every focus was on thier own PERSONAL OIL STOCKS. You know the expression money sticks with money. It was thier best interest to invade. first it was WMD, none. Then sadam's killings, not an excuse to re-write a countrys culture. Terror, so we go an blow people up. You can't expect a civilization for thousands of years to follow this gov's religious beliefs... the women will always be 10ft behind and all else. The white house wants a second US, they don't buy it and neither do I. It is about oil. there is no shortage and the dinosaurs are not the ones who made it through fossilization.. scientists have found oil a few million years above thier bones... to finish off... yes and myself adding.. 5000+ years and this country has only been around about 250 and everyone hates us overseas... think about it

Answer 3

No, the other people didnt lie. The best intelligence we had suggested Iraq had WMD's. The problem is, Bush decided to act on what was at best, shaky intelligence. Shaky enough, in fact, that the U.N. backed out of the planned invasion, until more substansive evidence could be obtained. So, while the others suspected Iraq had those weapons, Bush decided to roll the dice. He lost.

I understand what your saying about the scientists, and all that. My only point was that it wasnt good enough for the UN.

Answer 4

you will get a team of solutions calling you a liberal moron and with regard to the shells from 1990 they got here across and how "genuinely every person" thought they had weapons and the UN determination and so on and so on. and so on. Why might he lie? So he would desire to enforce the plans defined by ability of the Council for the hot Amercan Century interior the 1990's playstation Fox information did do a narrative on the previous shells. the dept of protection responsed that those weren't the WMDS noted by ability of Bush administration. the great Lie even however, became the implication that the US became in immenent possibility of being attacked by ability of Iraq, Cheney asserting "there's little doubt that Saddam has reconstituted his nuclear weapons application" and Condi speaking approximately mushroom clouds and having Powell provide bogus counsel to the UN that he now says became the worst concern he ever did in his existence. Iraq had no means of attacking the US, no air stress no army no missles able to reaching the US. crappy military.

Answer 5

Neither Pres. Lied....At the Trial of Sadam Hussein,the former Head of Iraqi Intelligence testified that they had been feeding false Intel to american and european sources with the hopes that they would not be attacked and be able to finish their nuclear program......Dont forget that back in the 80's Israel destroyed a nuclear plant in Iraq,so we know it was one of their goals to go nuclear......Yet despite all the evidence that Bush and Clinton both, did not lie.....People still Bash Bush for Lying about WMD's...I guess their just Stupid,or Their the ones Trying to shift the Real Issues facing this Country,as they commonly accuse Republicans of doing....Oh...By the way....I vote Independent...

Answer 6

If you're ignorant or liberal (same thing) forget what others may have said except Bush lied. The informed know exactly what the President said and why he said it. NO ONE lied, even those that were wrong did not lie, only (possibly) faulty intelligence. I for one think Saddam moved them to Syria. The biggest liar is ("I was in Vietnam") Kerry, who has more Purple Hearts in the least time served in action, and refuses to reveal his naval records to the public.

Answer 7

The CIA and other government agencies were prodded to produce reports that supported the Iraq Invasion and the claim that Iraq was a threat to the US. Congress and other governments were deceived with this information.
The Bush Administration takes great pains to purge TRUTH TELLERS from the ranks of the CIA and replace them with mouthpieces for their administration.

Answer 8

No, just like President Bush, the received bad information. Although, some WMD materials were found. But if you believe Bush lied, then you must believe they all lied esp. the Clintons.

Answer 9

Hey now you back woods hillbilly don't you know anything? No Clinton didn't lie. And he did not have woman with that sex.

Try to keep up with the political hacks in the newsmedia

Answer 10

Im going to write a book and call it "1001 little white lies of George W. Bush"