OJ guilty or innocent?

Question

Do you think O.J simpon is guilty or innocent?

Answer 1

Guilty!

Answer 2

Guilty

Answer 3

Guilty

Answer 4

Guilty

Answer 5

Guilty....If he was innocent why didn't the police continue to look for the "real" killer after the trial was over? Once the trial was done and he was found not guilty, the police should have sat down and looked over evidence and try to find more suspects. They didn't do this. Nothing was done and now Nicole and Ron are dead and no one seems to care about bringing the killer to justice...that is IF O.J. is not the real killer. Although now if more evidence was found against O.J. it wouldn't matter. He could not be brought to trial again for the same crime. That's double jeopardy.
But its over now and crap like this is just going to keep happening.

Answer 6

If you are a U.S. resident, then you know that our system states that IN A CRIMINAL CASE, an individual is innocent until proven guilty. And, we have the jury system wherein an individual' guilt is to be determined by a jury of his/or her peers. In this particular case, the jury has spoken: not guilty. Unless anyone of us was present at the trial and heard the jury deliberations, then we are not in a position to second guess the jury. Their duty was to determine if he was guilty BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT AND TO A MORAL CERTAINTY.

On the other hand, we are free to second guess the professionalism and the adequacy of the prosecution. I believe that they could have presented a more compelling case. However, the jury has spoken and now, IT IS OVER.

IN THE CIVIL CASE, there was a different standard to determine responsibility (the jury's function does not include determining guilt). In a civil case, the standard is BY THE WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE, IS IT MORE LIKELY THAT HE DID IT. Under this standard, the jury determined that he did. Since the two different types of trials (civil vs, criminal) have different standards, the fact that the two juries came up with different verdicts is not necessarily inconsistent.

NOW, since your handle is I DREAM OF SOCCER, aren't you excited about the World Cup?

I'm so excited.............the World Cup
THE FIRST GAME BEGINS IN JUST 15 HOURS !!!!!!!

Answer 7

When will people let this rest? Didn't a jury of his peers, (which until the O.J. case the majority of white America agreed with this system) find him not guilty? Is it suppose to work differently if the majority of the jurors are African American? The man is i-n-n-o-c-e-n-t, let it rest. And by the way, if O.J. had been accused of killing his African American wife, there wouldn't be any discussion.

Answer 8

Think OJ's son. Who else had access to all the property submitted as evidence. Besides we all know blacks and Indians are guilty until proofen innocent.

Answer 9

lemme think THEY plotted a glove that doesn't even fit! i think he is innocent BUt even if he was guilty the police tampered with so much to fame him you can't even prove it.
And why do u white people have to make everything a race war! ohh my gosh 1 black man was proven innocent Or got away what ever the case as if white people dont get away with a hell of alot more..

Answer 10

Guilty as sin. This case was a perfect example of those with money being able to get away with murder...literally. It had nothing to do with race (except that blacks let him off the hook).