Hoping wyldfyr48 and impeachgwb read this?

Question

Hey impeachgwb... long time since I bothered with your idiotic junk, but because I am sooooo elated with the demise of al- Zarqwai today, I am in the mood to tell you and the rest of you Michael Moore worshipping fools to get bent...
but first...
impeachgwb... you answered a question with a statistic stating casualties during the war taking place in Iraq (the War on Terror... maybe you have heard of it... I think you and the rest of the "Michaelites" refer to it as the war for oil). Anyways, uhhh, how many people (actually, let's call them civilians, as they were not military personell) were killed when Mohammed Atta and the rest of those scumbags rammed two fully loaded passenger planes into the towers, as well as the one plane that went down in Pa.? What was that number again? Am I going too fast for you? HOW MANY INNOCENT LIVES WERE CLAIMED ON SEPT.11, 2001?!?!?!?!?!?!??!
Oh yeah, almost forgot...
get bent!!!

Right, Lief... the United States attacked themselves so we could run around in the desert dodging camel droppings to... uhhh, to, ummm, well, uhhh, for what reason? That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard... anyone who believes that should ask the toothfairy to please lead them out of America and point them in the general direction of NeverLand

Hey "g"... I just read my question and re-read it... I did not say we are there because of 9/11, I ASKED THE QUESTION HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED DURING SEPT. 11... you stupid liberals who listen to the diareaha (probably misspelled but I don't care) that comes forth from the mouths of Kerry Moore, etc. just find things that aren't there. I was merely comparing the total deaths in Iraq that impeachgwb placed in his answer because it is the hip, in thing to do... I in turn asked HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED DURING 9/11... AND I'M STILL WAITING FOR ONE OF YOU SOCIALIST CONSPIRACY THEORISTS TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!

Wow, thanks for the answer "g"... hmmm, you mean it is NOT okay to compare two things that aren't connected... so I couldn't ask, for instance, mmmmm, who would win a fight between the Outlaw Josey Wales (a character played by Clint Eastwood) and Rambo (a character played by Sly Stalone? Okay "g", I'll TRY to be sure my questions suit you... too bad I'm not a liberal, I'd contact the ACLU because my feelings are hurt... but since I'm not a liberal (I'm one of those emotionless, evil, white Conservatives) I can't contact the ACLU... oh no, I have no way to get my feeling out... maybe I'll draw a picture of a tree and sing "Kum bi ya"!

okay sebok...
Remember those WMDs? Now I know the liberals will claim we aren't at war because of them, but, just because you don't find a missle silo with a box next to it stating: Warning: This is a nuclear warhead. Don't let the Americans find this" doesn't mean they weren't present... it doesn't need to be a warhead, it could be a $ trail, not to mention the President of an African nation (Sudan or Libya) stated his country was visited by Sadaam's people who had intentions of purchasing enriched uranium (which is not used in the mass production of microwaves). So Sadaam wanted uranium, he lied to inspectors, and completly ignored the UN Inspectors for years. Should we have waited for sadaam to create a nuke, bomb us, then go get him?

Answer 1

That is an interesting question. I agree completely with the sentiment.

Answer 2

Hi jeepman, I like the questions you ask people.
sebekhoteph asked: So, what are you doing in Iraq?
Maybe because we know Iraq is and was weak.
What better place to start a Democracy? Maybe that's all part of the big plan... oh wait that is the big plan. Some people just can't understand the big picture we are trying to do over there. One country at a time.

Answer 3

Hey Jeepman, according to you, USA should have attacked Saudi Arabia, not Saddam- damn him. Atta and most others were from Arabia, none from Iraq or Iran.

So, what are you doing in Iraq? Bending over to look for oil? Or creating a situation so that likes of Zarkavis can flood Iraq from all over the world, and ensure that even after USA leaves, there are millions of Zarkavi clones who'll keep up their jihadist work from up there.

Answer 4

The undeniable fact that in the course of some of these tragedies our nation is always going via, humans nonetheless discover it in themselves to support others as an alternative of having themselves to security. The undeniable fact that despite the fact that there are some of these horrible humans killing others there may be much more humans that make humans's lives greater. I desire that ultimately the ones humans will impact the arena simply adequate to finish the useless killing and get everybody to support the arena end up a greater location.

Answer 5

one of you conservatives is implying 9-11 has nothing to do with Iraq

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AnRVJ0S9vtq2A.lZ_4Rp0kzzy6IX?qid=20060608151357AAlv0me

Now you are saying that's why we are there (I would like to see facts that support that)?

Once again... you guys have no idea what you think is correct?

EDIT:
So what's the purpose of comparison, unless you are linking the two?

Are you just randomly asking questions that have nothing to do with one another? I assumed that you had a plan behind your questions, but perhaps I was wrong?

Oh and approximately 3,000 died on 9-11...

Answer 6

Did you ever think that the whole 9/11 was a set up by our own government and that Michael Moore may not be telling the whole story. See it for yourself.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&pr=goog-sl

Answer 7

yea that is interesting.. Was the question if the war in "Iraq" was on terror or for oil? I think the answer would be neither..