English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No way any tax on us is not a loss2 our economy. Why are so many brainwashed n2 taxes for our loss. Extra moneyn2 our economy is way better than the loss we have now!Everything now puts the whole cost on our backs. Why not put the cost on cheaters and illegals? This way is billions more n2 our economy and any tax on us is a dead loss for us. Plus all the paper work costs. There is no fair tax4 us. Taxes are only fair2 us if foreign tax cheats and illegal do the paying! Flat tax costs us& adds nothing2 our economy. Flat tax does nothing2 stop foreign tax cheats. Flat tax does nothing4 illegal off tax roles. Sales tax comes out of the economy& is aloss. The way I'm proposeing has no tax loopholes. All the illegals pay, all foriegn tax cheats pay. If the foreign goods do not sell4 retail&r discounted the tax@retail was still paid. We get dicounted goods& retail taxes. All this added money2 our economy. Any& all taxes on us r aloss. Everyone knows losses are not good. Only gains are good!

2006-06-08 11:25:32 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

That won't work. I'd explain it, but I doubt you'd understand it.

2006-06-08 12:04:17 · answer #1 · answered by psych0bug 5 · 0 0

Taxation without Representation. Taxes have been the cornerstone of every civilization from the Greeks to the present. What would happen to the economy with the tax dollars going into road construction for one?? Beyond the loss of jobs, the entire shipping industry would be shut down, and then the US economy.

2006-06-20 07:48:06 · answer #2 · answered by harry s 1 · 0 0

You would benefit form taking a course in freshman composition. In this way your ideas could be presented in a coherent and organised manner.

The problem with the question is that it is very difficult to read and make sense of. You seem to be ranting and listing off numerous unfounded statements. They are not clear. And there is no evidence for anything you state. Furthermore what country are you talking about?

Perhaps this could be a very good question but unfortunately I am unable to understand what it is you are saying and most importantly asking.

2006-06-17 02:35:49 · answer #3 · answered by Ouros 5 · 0 0

De issue wit da Brits was taxation w/o representation, Yo! Dis time we gots de representation so we gets to decide where de mulah is spent...boooooyeeee! An aside: I found it much more difficult to type ebonics than to merely type a legible paragraph, you should try it sometime.

2006-06-17 08:15:00 · answer #4 · answered by texaspicker0 3 · 0 0

I was just thinking about that the other day - the colonists getting
fed up & dumping tea into the Boston Harbor.
Hopefully, if you asked it & I thought it, there are others & maybe
demanding reform isn't that far off.

2006-06-08 11:39:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you are barely legibile, learn to write with out using numbers. it makes you sound ignorant. as far as fighting the british, we fought to be free from taxation with out representation. we were being taxed by the british, but had no representation in their government.

2006-06-08 11:31:41 · answer #6 · answered by forjj 5 · 0 0

If you used spell check, you would have been taken a bit more seriously.

2006-06-08 11:29:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know how old you are dude but I never fought no Brits meownself...

2006-06-22 10:47:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers