Anyone else think it would have been better to torture Al-Zarqawi than to let him die so easily?

Question

I'm thinking a more fitting torture for a piece of human debris like Al-Zarqawi would have been to frame him killing a puppy and then make him sit in front of a computer and read the mind-numbing ramblings of Yahoo! liberals as they reacted to the plight of the poor puppy. After a few days he would have known what true agony is like.

Feel free to come up with a different fitting torture if you disagree with mine.

"Beth" ... shame on you. You are SO liberal that you would object to the torture of one of the biggest scumbag's in human history? Good Lord, Beth, even Osama bin Laden spoke out against this guy which means that you're even more extreme than bin Landen himself. Nice.

Answer 1

Fly him 5 ft above what the World Trade Centers height was and say "If it was still here you'd still be alive" and give him a big push maybe with some concertina wire around his neck.

Answer 2

First a couple facts. AMZ is originally from Jordan an went to Afghanistan to help Osama Bin Laden fight the Soviet Army. That's why he ran Al Qaeda in Iraq. I'm not sure where he was originally captured, but he was held by the Jordanian government after 9/11 due to his known association with Osama. Jordanian laws do not restrict things that might be called torture. Why do you think AMZ helped plan the hotel bombings in Amman, Jordan a few months back? Here's another little fun bit, the bombers in that attack were Iraqis.

Answer 3

Eisenhower did not approve of torture. The entire western world was in danger during WWII and Ike still felt torture was never an option.

Eisenhower understood that as Americans we are better than that.

I Like Ike.

I have read a few of your answers - I remember that you support Mass Murder as well. Do you remember? You wanted to Nuke most of the middle east after 9-11. That's a lot of Women and Children.

You would have us turn as evil as the people we are fighting.

Answer 4

Since you are so opinonated about this US mistake in Iraq, why don't you and Bush's daughters take up arms and fight in the war yourselves!

To kill those that are killing is a sure sign of a rational peace loving organism. Perhaps you should see the death and dying of children and other non-combatants like I did in VN. You might have another view but I doubt it. People that are quick to make ignorant comments should experience war first hand. Not just watch it on TV!

Answer 5

Anyone think its funny that these kids are buying the press hype for the 4th time we've officially killed this guy? Maybe they just now learned his name.

What's really amazing is that this propoganda stunt is being played up for all that it isn't worth, and it's working on at least a few small minds. The good news is that this farce of a "war on terror" might be able to be justifiably canned for the waste of life and tax dollars that it is.

Answer 6

I can only guess that your hatred of so called liberals comes from not gettin' any from your uptight conservative wife or girlfriend. Or watching your liberal friends score all the time with lots of different women? Or maybe you are a Log Cabin Republican? Not sure, but you have as much hate as good ol' Ann Coulter. Betcha you like her a lot. She'd kill that puppy for ya, that's for sure.

Answer 7

No, why waste time and resouces, he is recieving torture greater than we could ever dish out as we speak. He had to be killed quickly, a sort of strike while the iron was hot sort of deal, an attempt to capture could have resulted in his escape.

Answer 8

Their is no point in torture dieing and going to hell is the ultimate torture for Al-Zarqawi.

Answer 9

The rel torture has just begun. The next life for him will be nothing but hell. Let's leave that in God's hand.

Answer 10

He's probably getting tortured right now by his 72 virgins who turned out to be pigs.