English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

George Washington of course....you need to look him up in the french and Indian war, he totally was a massacre. he actually washed his hands in the brains of the indians in order to spread his fear. the other georges don't have nothing close to even touch that

2006-06-08 09:56:15 · answer #1 · answered by grateful6979 4 · 2 0

Washington. Costanza would probably run, and Clooney is just too handsome to fight, no sense in ruining his pretty face.

2006-06-08 17:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by tinks44 4 · 0 0

George Washington .. he was a tough man

2006-06-15 16:39:04 · answer #3 · answered by phnowner 3 · 0 0

How about George.

2006-06-08 20:06:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Id put my money on Clooney- but Washington may have been a scrapper!

2006-06-08 16:56:06 · answer #5 · answered by RED 5 · 0 0

Costanza cuz he is a weasel and woulnd't fight fair.

2006-06-08 17:09:12 · answer #6 · answered by heidinichole 4 · 0 0

george clooooney

2006-06-08 17:09:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

costanza for sure, he fights dirtier, can think up more lies, and wears goretex

2006-06-08 16:57:20 · answer #8 · answered by whoisgod71 3 · 0 0

Washington could whoop em both, even dead.

2006-06-08 16:57:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

GEORGE COSTANZA

He'll fight dirty

2006-06-08 17:25:32 · answer #10 · answered by Enigma C 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers