And while we are at it ... why are we sending over $38Billion each year to them? What 'good' do they do with the money?
2006-06-08 10:13:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ex IT 1
·
1⤊
3⤋
That is a stupid question. How about i move you to a jungle in Africa! Why would they want to move? And the reason why they are in Israel in the first place is because it is our holy land. That is where we have a greater connection to G-d. That is where most of our forefathers are buried and that is where the wailing wall is. And why should we be the ones to move if all we are trying to do is live peaceful while being persucted by the Arabs?
Secondly, if you look back in history you will see that the world cannot survive without Jews. Even though the Jewish population is just 1% of the world, there is a huge percentage of Jewish doctors, lawyer, inventors, and noble peace prize winners.
If you look back in history to any country that has killed and evicted the Jews, you will see that their downfall came very quickly once we left. An example of that would be Spain after the Inquisition by the Christian church, or Germany/Poland and many other European countries after the holocaust. And there are many more examples.
You can see that in the country Israel itself. Before the jews took over most of the land was a barren desert. The country was in ruins. As soon as we came, it got built up to the beautiful countyr it is now. We grew things, made settlement and built up the country. The Arab countries around Israel are still 3rd world countries, while Israel is advancing fast. But what are the Palestinians doing? They are stealing the land from us - AFTER WE BUILD IT UP! This happened in the Gush Katif and is continuing to happen. We must put a stop to it!
2006-06-12 04:08:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sunshine 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why should the Jews have to move? Why shouldn't the so-called "Palestinians" have to move ... if they were sent to deep in the interior of Brazil they wouldn't be able to terrorize anyone anymore.
The fact is the the Jews have a 3000 year presence in Israel, predating the Arabs by 1600 years. Israel has every right to the entirety of Greater Israel. From the Bible to the Balfour Declaration Israel has a title deed to the land it's on. In fact, the Palestine referred to in the Balfour Declaration includes Jordan -- there already is an Arab-Palestinian state on 4/5 of the land promised to the Jews and it's called Jordan.
No country has ever agreed to a "peace" agreement where it gives up its land in exchange for a piece of paper promising peace. This is as if the US gave the Rocky Mountains to some terrorist organization threatening it.
2006-06-08 10:01:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would the destruction of France be such a bad thing? Move all the French to another country and let Germany be bigger. After all who likes the French? Why would the destruction of Tiwian be such a bad thing? Move all those people to another country and let China have their country and end that arguement. Why would the making Korea one country be such a bad thing? Either move the South Koreans to the U.S. or move the North Koreans to Communist China. Hey there are so many other examples. I notice how you pick on Isreal though. That is THEIR land, it is THEIR historical homeland.
2006-06-08 10:01:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gee- heres a better idea- evacuate all the Palestinians across the borders into Jordan and Egypt - they all have large Palestinian populations (hey, Jordan even has a Palestinian majority)- and leave Israel the entirety of the area! After all, Israel already has peace agreements with jordan and Egypt and walla- you have instant peace, and a bunch of terrorists being punished for refusing to negotiate, all in one go!
Problem is, that is as ridiculous as moving the Jews out of the area- try to forcefully evacuate the jews and they will fught back- try to evacuate the Palestinians and their "brethren" in their new countries will merely throw them into new refugee camps and claim foul.
Nope- the only solution is a two state one- as much as the anti-semites of the world think it is OK ti uproot Jewish families, some of whom have lived in the area for 3500 years!
2006-06-13 02:24:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by allonyoav 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because no matter which way you look at it. Israel is the most "holy" piece of land in the world. The palentines (sp) claim that the land was given to them by Allah. Before 1930s, that area was mostly Muslim held territory. But sine the Nazi invasion and world war II many jews escaped to either America or to Israel. The muslims hate the jews because they "killed" Jesus Christ. They considered Jesus a prophet, not the god that christians believe he is.
2006-06-08 10:04:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by jack_daniels 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes r u kidding? its the arabs that need to end the fighting and there will be peace. Anyhow, there wouldnt be enough room for all of the israelis here, we have so many problems with the mexicans- why should we move more ppl here? It would greatly hurt our economy, govt and everything basically. where would they work/live etc? its not so easy to move a nation, even if its small, to another place! from a religious perspective, no way! Israel, esp, Jerusalem and the western wall is very sacred and holy to many diffrent ppl.
2006-06-08 09:58:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you like an instantaneous answer, in all likelihood on no account. united statesa. has an huge array of allies, and we forgive a united states of america or team after a dispute or conflict (in comparison to a pair). A conflict to defeat the US and Isreal may well be a pointless and intense priced project, and basically upload to the international's already magnificent occasion of problems. the international isn't arranged, and could maximum probable on no account be, to team up, much less to combat a huge conflict against 2 international powers.
2016-12-08 18:36:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by moncalieri 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok I think that this is really an absurd question, but lets turn it around ? Why not just move the Muslims away from the Jews? If you were to trace your lineage back, you will see that they are all closely related in ethnic backgrounds. So, the Jews faith has been around longer than the Muslim faith.
2006-06-08 10:17:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Huff_Dawg 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the Jews were there first. It's their land.
2006-06-08 10:19:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by jwurz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋