Are metro sexual males better than other men?

Answer 1

Firstly, the term "metrosexual" grates every time I hear it. Basically, it means "vain guy who spends far too much money on clothes and makeup, unfairly raises the bar for average Joes".

It's somebody who fails to notice the important things in life (Games, DVDs, comics, etc) and instead buys fancy shirts that they look a total idiot in, instead of t-shirts with amusing slogans like any normal guy would.

If we examine the term, "metro" means "town", so this implies there are none in the countryside (why?) and "sexual" implies "despite the fact that they are well-dressed, they aren't gay and in fact are getting plenty". There is an implied homophobia in the term - that gay guys are totally up on fashion, so we need a special term for "ordinary" guys up on fashion. Why else would if they were "getting any" or not be relevant?

There's a much better term: "flash git". So, no, they aren't better people, they are hollow, self-obsessed morons who are most likely wandering down a street somewhere with an iPod in one hand and Starbucks in another, because buying brands and flaunting them makes you cool!

Answer 2

We don't know,but from looking at your yahoo profile,you have some kind of "phobia" concerning white men.Wanna explain what that's all about?