Women, Does it matter if a guys cut or uncut?

Answer 1

whats this have to do with fast food? but i prefer cut

Answer 2

Hmmmmm, unclean Sammy? U really dont have a clue what ur talking about.

In answer to the question ... It should matter to more parents (fathers in particular) - The sensation of being "cut" (to a baby) is very similar to ripping off a nail (hurts dont it?) , the reason for this is a protective coating (like glue) over the glans. The reason this coating is there in the first place is to protect from infections or damage, it does diminish as the child gets older hence allowing the foreskin to be rolled back.

The second reason there should be concern is that most of a guys satisfaction is derived from this "off cut" which comprises a whole bundle of please receptors (almost as many as in a womans clitoris) - this is compared to the glans which only has a handful of pleasure receptors but a vast quantity of pain receptors.

There are also lubrication issues when the boy is "cut" as this "off cut" also produces natural lubricants, without these there is a possibility of needing to buy your own.

There is no evidence of increased health problems in uncut males. And as for being "unclean" ... both men and women produce fluids which if left will congeal, smell and increase the risks of infections. The fact of a guy being cut or uncut has absolutely no bearing on this, it simply comes down to whether the guy is lazy and unclean in the first place. It is easy to clean after all.

Oh - and if you want one final argument against it - lets ponder female circumcision while we're at it women.

Answer 3

Wow what alot of interesting answers to this question! The only reason they started with the circumsitions is because men were not pulling their foreskin back and cleaning it properly leading to infections. Ladies don't fret! If a guy is taught early to pull it back and clean it then there should be no problems. As a matter of fact it has been medically proven that men with their foreskin actually have better orgasims. So I say there is nothing wrong with having the skin as long as you keep it clean for both you and your partners sake. Anything that will allow your partner to have better sex is a good thing. Hagd

Answer 4

Cut is much better then uncut. My mom had both of my brothers cut at birth because it is suppose to be better for boys. I am not sure why, but you should talk to your doctor.

Answer 5

I prefer men uncut. Hygiene is just as good as cut if he cleans himself normally. I love the foreskin!! :-)

Answer 6

It doesn't matter to me at all... as long as the person's hygeine is okay...

I have two sons... one's circumsized and one is not. It's no big deal... In fact, the doctor told me that out of the boys being born in the past 10 years, most of them are not circumsized. That made me feel a bit better about not having it done to my oldest son.

Answer 7

My husband is uncut, and he has great personal hygiene, so it works. It does the job, hands down!

Answer 8

no, cut is cleaner, but if a man is uncut he should clean it and that is was matters

Answer 9

Um, i prefer them to be circumcised. But a lot of women don't care....but if you aren't cut, women might be more hesitant because they don't if you clean your self well or not. Ween cheese is not cute or something I want to taste. I'll stick to cheddar.

Answer 10

Why is this in the fast food category??? But no not to me, when they get hard (from what i've seen) they look almost the same. So not really a big deal.

Answer 11

Nope. Unless you mean in the John Wayne Bobbit way. That would kind of suck.