To be truly ignorant they must not know these things . . . by not reading the news or attending to televised news or radio or sharing knowledge of these events with anyone . . . so I need to question the question. Is it not a matter that the conservatives "refuse to acknowledge" the disasters rather than ignore them? Or perhaps we are making to a fine a point of what the hell the idiots are blundering into. One thing I know for sure is that we can't maintain or add to our infrastructure in this country now that the major industries of material processing are gone (no steel, brick, concrete, plastic, oil etc.). And now that we've pissed off the rest of the world, it's just a matter of time before they shut us down. But the haughty arrogant "I just voted my wallet" folks either have no clue (and are ignorant) or they are conspiring to destroy the U.S. of A. because they are totally mad or seditionists and should be hung. Criminently! When was the last time you saw a US flag made in the USA? They are now made in Taiwan and mainland China - are americans proud of that? What about those yellow ribbon stickers on their cars, all made in China! Those yellow ribbons (Gad what a stupid song that was based on them melody completely out of place with the lyric content. The best place to apply those yellow ribbon stickers are on your gas caps folks, just to remind you "why". I really do hope the conservatives will come to their senses before they are forced to learn to speak Chinese at gunpoint.
2006-06-08 08:41:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disasters. I suppose it wouldn't be too difficult for you to actually tell us what these alleged 'disasters' are, would it? Or just pick one and we can, at least from our side, logically and intelligently debate whether this was actually a disaster and if it was actually Bush's fault.
Bring it on.
-----------------
Iraq - name the 'disaster'. We destoyed Saddam's military in 3 weeks. We've adopted well to tactical changes by our enemy, and Iraq has a democratically elected government and a constitution and an increasingly large and powerful armed forces.
Katrina - there were some screwups, but considering the size of the whole thing, that was bound to occur. federal help arrived quicker than it did after the florida hurricanes, and most of the 'horror' stories turned out to be media-generated fiction. Funny how Mississippi, which was hit just as hard, didn't have the problems that Louisiana had, no? Could it be more competent local government, which is supposed to provide the first 3-5 days of relief?
Homeland security - well, it IS government. But I do not recall any terrorist attacks on our soild these past, almost 5 years.
Health Care - This in not the federal government's responsibility, and yes, they need to get out of the business. Their meddling and charity is unconstitutional.
Environment. The environment is fine, if not better than it was when Bush inherited it from Clinton. Kyoto was already dead, killed by the Senate 95-0 under Clinton. The insane environmental standards signed into law by Clinton just before he got out were unrealistic. And Bush's law to let power plants, etc, upgrade without having to then meet all the latest standards (cost prohibitive) meant they implemented productivity improvements and smaller enviro fixes, resulting in better enviro emissions, than they would have if they didn't do anything at all.
so, it's all a bunch of smoke and mirrors from the left.
2006-06-08 15:32:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it is egg on their faces. When have you ever heard of conservatives admitting a mistake anyways? Maybe they still think the reason for going to war was to bring humanitarian aid to Iraq. oops! Guess they forgot the fact that Bush said it was because of weapons of mass destruction...that they didn't have! Maybe they think the war is justified because they did get rid of Sadaam after all...but what about all of the other unstable dictatorships around the world? Oh that's right, they don't have as much oil as Iraq.
2006-06-08 15:28:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by kikisdragon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they are trivial compared to the mess created by the former administration. Maybe if Clinton would of had some balls and not cared about poll #'s - he might be remembered for more than Monica.
2006-06-08 15:33:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by therandman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
"There aren't enough heavy-hitting Bush Pioneers left on the planet to help 2006 GOP candidates overcome their Iraq mistakes, their Katrina incompetence, and their miserable record of failure on everything from homeland security to health care to the environment."
In other words, its doesn't matter what the 29% minority think. Just humor them and let them talk and pretend that you are listening.
2006-06-08 15:36:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question & answer to your question aren't very clear.
Could you be more specific as to which disaster he has made and the "liberals" have been blamed for?
2006-06-08 15:27:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because we are too busy trying to ignore morons like YOU!
2006-06-08 15:24:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't make a bit of sense.
2006-06-08 15:42:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't justify answers.
2006-06-08 15:23:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
U.S. MILITARY DEATHS IN IRAQ: 2480
U.S. MILITARY WOUNDED IN IRAQ: 18254
2006-06-08 18:30:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by impeachgwb 5
·
0⤊
0⤋