Rampant terrorism in Iraq, which was led by al-zarqawi, will now lose most of its steam coupled with Iran being defiant to the wishes of the US, which is now over as they have been scared into accepting talks, it seems the ENTIRE campaign platform for liberals is now gone. What will libs have to run on now?
P.S. ... God bless the United States military!
2006-06-08 02:26:36 · 14 answers · asked by David Styvaert 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
"ihatebush" ... please, PLEASE, keep writing stuff like that. Your idiotic rants will ensure the Democrat loss in November.
"You are idiot". Man, it's tough to be condecending to people when you can't properly structure a sentence, isn't it?
2006-06-08 02:34:07 · update #1
There is more hope now that things will start to settle down. But don't count on it happening immediatly. Anything concerning politics local to global is like breeding elephants. There's a lot of work, lot of noise, and it's over two years before you see any results.
And thanks for the blessing.
2006-06-08 02:33:30 · answer #1 · answered by namsaev 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
1. Terrorism will not lose steam, even Bush said so in his conference.
2. Iran agreed to talks several weeks before Zarqawi's death but still remain defiant and steadfast in their nuclear ambitions.
3. This is not a partisian issue, trying to turn it in to a "lib-bashing" only shows ignorance and immaturity.
Thank you
2006-06-08 22:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorism in Iraq will end just like cocaine trafficking ended when Pablo Escobar was killed.
2006-06-08 17:58:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by knowmeansknow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran is now talking with the US because we are lifting sanctions and providing light-water nuclear reactors.
Note: This deal is very similar to what Clinton proposed to North Korea. That effectively ended North Korea's nuclear program, but guess who fuc
Good that he's dead, but unfortunately it doesn't change a damn thing as far as the war goes. History shows that taking out one man does little if anything in the end (See the killing of Uday and Qusay, and the capture of Saddam).
Quick trivia how many of you know that Ho Chi Minh died in September 1969? That certainly changed things in Vietnam now didn't it.
Oh well, at least justice has been served, though I would have preferred if they had captured him then executed him. Who knows maybe they could've gotten some much needed intelligence out of him before painfully disposing of him.
2006-06-08 20:57:36 · answer #4 · answered by Epicurean Fool 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remember that the rest of their strategery was that "Republiscums" were corrupt (as they Demtards aren't) and they would be able to pick up their fifteen seats because people would be tired of the Republican corruption.
Except that in a special election in San Diego for a Republican Congressman who is now in jail, the Democrats couldn't even pick up that seat. Oopsie.
Nobody cares about the liberals except themselves. Nobody.
2006-06-08 09:29:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your tenious links between the death of the Jordanian, and the resurgence of the Repuglicans leave me dumb-founded. Politics apart, do you really believe the American peoples are so stupid and scatter brain that they will overlook 6 years of abject mis-rule because of the death of one man. You are amazing.. However I agree with you, God bless all soldiers putting their lives at risk for the idiots in Pennsylvania ave and Downing street.
2006-06-08 11:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ummm...AlGore can make some more Global Warming BS, but that is running out of steam too, people (Scientists) are just doubting it now.
Or maybe they can run on raising taxes? Or maybe they will just say "We have nothing to run on but we DO hate Bush...so elect us" and all the mindless idiots will still vote for them.
BUSH WAS RIGHT AND NOW SOME ARE REALIZING IT...SOME WILL NEVER REALIZE IT...
2006-06-08 09:36:17 · answer #7 · answered by DAVER 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are child to think terror lose steam. More crazy people will take the place of Zarquawi. You are idiot.
2006-06-08 09:30:24 · answer #8 · answered by Dr.Feelgood 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Attacks are going to still happen, but this will certainly help.
But then you will get the Libs, on here who do not have the depth to understand we are fighting radical Islam in Iraq, and they will dismiss it.
2006-06-08 09:31:04 · answer #9 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
zarqawi's death isn't going to slow the insurgency.
keep on with the partisan squabbling; pissing and moaning about liberals is really going to solve problems, right?
2006-06-08 09:37:09 · answer #10 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋