English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-08 00:54:47 · 7 answers · asked by thebloodygout 1 in News & Events Current Events

Joe I will ask the questions thanks!

2006-06-08 01:07:17 · update #1

7 answers

It was very complicated.

They sent Armstrong and crew up to the moon to take pictures of exactly what it looked like up there.

Then they came back home, built a multi-million dollar studio (in order to keep the secret they couldn't let Hollywood in on it), recreated the moon exactly as Armstrong had reported it, built a multi-million dollar replica of the capsule (since the original one was obviously used and wouldn't have worked to convince people this was the first time it had been driven), spent billions of dollars setting up a gravity room identical to the moon's gravity, set up cameras and filmed Armstrong from there.

2006-06-08 01:12:02 · answer #1 · answered by tagi_65 5 · 1 0

My wife's father did perform fuel calculations for the original Apollo landing, I'll spare you that story. Instead, I will encourage you to watch two programs. The first show is called Conspiracy Moon Landing that it currently showing on the National Geographic Channel and it pretty much obliterates all of the popular conspiracy theories, including yours.

The I would also encourage you to watch a movie called Capricon One. Made it 1978, it is a fictional movie about a fake mission to mars. Although it is a science fiction story, it is a good example of how utterly impossible it would be to fake a moon landing for any length of time.

12 men walked on the moon from 1969 to 1972 and we simply don't have the resources nor technology to pull off that big of a hoax for so long. Hundreds of thousands of people have worked on the space program. It would be far easier to put someone on the moon than to try and fake it and keep it secret for nearly 40 years.

The landings came at a time when our space program was ultra competitive with the former Soviet Union. Remember how big of a deal it was when Sputnik was put into orbit? They had the technology to monitor our moon shots and transmissions. Don't you they they would have called is out if they have evidence that it was all fake?

Perhaps the most definitive proof of our trip to the moon is what we left behind. For the last 30+ years, scientist have been beaming lasers to the moon and meansuring the return times. How are they doing this? Because the beams are reflected back by equipment left on the moon on in onto 1 but 3 different locations.

Case closed.

2006-06-11 19:59:25 · answer #2 · answered by Carl 7 · 0 0

you don't believe that America sent men to the moon, but you don't have any idea of how it was in your opinion "staged"? Doesn't it make more sense to just admit that America did in fact send men to the moon?

2006-06-08 08:02:08 · answer #3 · answered by joeandhisguitar 6 · 0 0

It wasent faked. Conspirict therorists are idiots.

2006-06-08 08:12:20 · answer #4 · answered by species8472 2 · 0 0

It was done at Michael Jackson's house, Neverland.

2006-06-08 08:04:11 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

Get lost.

2006-06-14 20:55:13 · answer #6 · answered by CottonPatch 7 · 0 0

Hollywood............... they have their ways.

2006-06-08 07:58:18 · answer #7 · answered by doodle 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers