English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-07 23:35:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Movies

11 answers

It's a horror movie. How can it be nice?

2006-06-07 23:37:12 · answer #1 · answered by Sean F 4 · 0 0

There's really only two words to describe remaking cult classic The Omen: Not necessary.

Story
= = =

This Omen update follows the 1976 original to the letter, opening itself up to endless comparisons and scrutiny, and ultimately doesn't measure up. Of course, the basic premise is the same: Unbeknownst to his lovely wife, Katharine (Julia Stiles), future U.S. Ambassador Robert Thorn (Liev Schreiber) adopts a baby in a Rome hospital after their own child "dies" in childbirth.

Said child, Damien (Seamus Davey Fitzpatrick), grows up and at the age of five, quickly starts to develop evil tendencies his mother can't understand--such as making his nanny hang herself, watching as the monkeys in the zoo go crazy and having a violent reaction to going to church.

The usual antichrist stuff. There's the priest (Pete Postlethwaite), who warns Thorn that his child is the son of the devil, the photographer (David Thewlis), who inadvertently gets involved--and the new nanny, Mrs. Baylock (Mia Farrow), who vows to "protect" the little one, with a Rottweiler in tow. You know the rest.

Acting
= = = =

One of the only things this remake gets right is casting Schreiber and Stiles as the younger, more tortured Thorns. Their love for one another seems genuine, and Stiles especially adds some nice touches to portraying a mother who is growing more and more afraid of her own little boy.

Thewlis (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban) is sufficiently bedraggled as the doomed shutterbug, while Postlethwaite (The Constant Gardener) decries the end of the world with aplomb. But Mrs. Baylock is suppose to be a tough and scary lady (played in the original by Billie Whitelaw), and Farrow instead plays her meek and motherly, someone who could easily be defeated. And then there's Damien, who is just all wrong.

The original has him as a cherubic little British boy, who's just beginning to get an inkling on who he really is. In other words, he doesn't glower and shoot demonic daggers every time he looks at someone, the way the young Fitzpatrick plays him. There's no need to show us again and again he's evil. We get it.

Direction
= = = = =

The idea of revisiting this story about the antichrist must have seemed good on paper. The film tackles a lot of juicy, topical matters about global unrest, tied into religious beliefs, much like The Da Vinci Code. And under the guidance of director John Moore (The Flight of the Phoenix), the film looks and feels very menacing.

With Prague standing in for London, this Omen is dank, cold and unforgiving. But in doing a nearly shot by shot replica, a few things are missed that might have helped: The creepy choir music which plays every time Damien is about to do something really awful, for one; and the monkeys going nuts at the sight of Damien in a zoo isn't nearly as effective as the baboons attacking the car in the original.

Honestly, all this movie made me want to do is watch the original Omen again (which is being released on DVD as a collector's edition June 20). Sometimes is just better not to mess with a classic.

Bottom Line
= = = = = = =

Hollywood.com rated this film 1 1/2 stars.

2006-06-08 08:22:50 · answer #2 · answered by prad 3 · 0 0

If you saw Rosemary's baby, you will like the Omen.

2006-06-08 06:59:07 · answer #3 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

I went to see it the day it came out and I'll tell you the theatre was full. People were screaming and jumping off their seat...and I was one of them!! It was good although you have to listen from the beginning in order to understand the entire film. If you do not like films that are about God and Satan, don't watch it. Awsome ending!!!

2006-06-08 11:56:05 · answer #4 · answered by Mel C 2 · 0 0

The story is a little on the dark side
camera work is good lots of close ups
a real set under your chair film
yes enjoyed it very much tough it was fun

2006-06-08 06:41:31 · answer #5 · answered by stillhappy89 4 · 0 0

I saw the original and saw the remake just yesterday and I liked both.
If you like scary movies,you should go see this movie.
check out the website www.heedtheomen.com

2006-06-08 10:02:46 · answer #6 · answered by sandiegogal2002@yahoo.com 3 · 0 0

it was ok not worth the 2 hour wait in line but i have adhd so it was preety good

2006-06-08 06:38:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i seen the preveiws looks good i probly will go see it

2006-06-08 06:56:56 · answer #8 · answered by nicegirl187smile 5 · 0 0

about the anti-christ so it isn't nice!

2006-06-08 13:42:42 · answer #9 · answered by lou 7 · 0 0

do not think it can be good, something i would not watch....!

2006-06-08 07:01:09 · answer #10 · answered by destiny 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers