I think sometimes the terms are interchangeable.
I disagree with the assessment of Dr. Phil as "pop psychology," in the sense of insinuating his work is garbage. It's not.
I'm not a rabid fan, but he's extremely good at cutting right to the core of the issue and providing very practical, very useful advice to turn people around. He doesn't pretend to be a long-term therapist, he just offers to spot-check problems and get things started on a right track. To me, that's not really "pop psychology."
I consider "pop psych" to be generalized fluff that sounds good and can be reduced to a soundbite but that people can't really apply easily to their lives. They'll just quote it, nod their head affirmingly, then go right on living just as they'd lived before, with no substantial change. It's usually stuff that makes you feel good about yourself, without any change involved.
Pop psych is like a diet fad -- it sounds good, people try it out, then drop it if they can't figure out how to make it work or if it ends up just being fluff.
Pseudo psych is a thought system that sounds technical enough that you'd think it was real, but is really just based on conjecture without any real evidence or experience.
You can explain the theory and its components; but when you actually study it and test it, it proves to not be very accurate. (All style and big words, no substance.)
2006-06-08 04:17:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jennywocky 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
popular psychology and pseudo psychology could be considered the branches of the same bush. Popular psychology Think: "Dr. Phil." Pseudo-psychology, think: advice from your guy friends about what women think/want ..
2006-06-07 18:50:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by earthling4luv 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
with the aid of fact often times a individual's habit could be defined by ability of a deficiency or surplus or a neurotransmitter interior the innovations, or a trauma in the direction of a undeniable area of the innovations. for instance, a individual who suffers trauma to the front of the innovations (even whether it particularly is microscopic) is often without "human" thoughts. they can't experience happy, unhappy or love, yet they have not have been given any situation feeling anger and rage. If a individual like this stated that they have been given right into a automobile twist of destiny a month in the past and says he's having a sparkling situation of thrashing his spouse, something he in no way thought-approximately doing previously, a solid psychologist might ask your self if injury became accomplished to the frontal lobe of his cerebral cortex and order an mri. yet another occasion is that if a individual complains to her therapist that she has been depressed for 2 months and that it appeared to come again out of nowhere, a solid psychologist might rule out the depletion of the neurotransmitters serotonin and norepinephrine. those are believed to be linked with some situations of melancholy. If it is got here across to be the case, then the therapist might prescribe drugs that develop the provision of neurotransmitters on the synaptic junction by ability of blockading the reuptake channel.
2016-10-30 09:39:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's both...thanks for asking
2006-06-07 20:44:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by imadufus72 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
same thing, i think
2006-06-10 03:28:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by maria p 3
·
0⤊
0⤋