Does anyone have any sites that debunk this video?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&q=loose+change+2e
Not trying to spread the conspiracy just trying to find out if it has really been proven false.. Out of curiosity.
And I don't believe one way or the other...
2006-06-07
17:51:58
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Lancelot- Clearly you can not read, they have programs that can help you. I was just looking for a site that proves it wrong. Did not need your rant. I don't know why I'm typing this though since you can't understand it...
2006-06-07
18:38:22 ·
update #1
Thanks ollie..
2006-06-07
18:38:52 ·
update #2
Lancelot: Again you are proving your inability to comprehend. If you did read through my question's and answers than you would know that I've not once said I believe it. I've said it brings up a lot of interesting points and deserves an investigation. I'm guessing that your the type of person who would form an opinion on one side alone. I bet you watched Farenhype 9-11 and already know Farenheight 9-11 was nothing but lies without ever seeing the movie. This question was merely to get the other side. Nothing more..
2006-06-08
06:59:25 ·
update #3
Popular Mechanics Article here:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html
Pentagon Site here:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html
Structural failure report by NIST here:
http://wtc.nist.gov/
A little common sense will get you thinking the right way. Good luck.
2006-06-07 18:25:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by djollie111 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
As with almost any conspiracy theories, you can find almost anyone and anything to say what you want it to. In addition, who is to say 1/2 of this documentary is not something doctored?
1. What would our government have to gain by killing its own citizens?
2. Why did Osama bin Laden claim responsibility to this if our government did it?
3. We did not need a reason to go to war with Iraq other then the UN Security violations already on file and being dealt with.
4. Why did Zacarias Moussaoui admit to being the 20th Hijacker?
5. President Bush had only been in office for less then 9 months. The terrorist who pulled off the attacks had been here since 1999. Did President Bush have a contact with the future to know he would be president to talk with Al-Qaeda to do this?
Al-Qaeda has admitted to doing ALL of the 9/11/2001 damage and was aiming to do a lot more. The White House and the Capitol buildings where suppose to be target's as well.
I have come to the conclusion that Al-Qaeda was who did the 9/11 terrorist attacks. I think the Government knew something could have happened that day, but since the Bill Clinton Administration, none of the agencies involved could talk to each other, they could not have pieced all the puzzles together.
This conspiracy theory has more holes in it then Swiss cheese does. If they think President Bush did this, why not say so? Be honest on where they stand. The people that created this theory have such a hate for anyone who is conservative that they would even create something that would destroy a president and a country to make sure that their kind get power back.
These kinds of theories do not need to be debunked; they do it well on their own.
God Bless. Common since will prevail.
ADDIDTION:
DJ Ollies post has definate things that prrove against the theories. Why do we only hear of the theories and not the debunking? When Clinton was President and there was theories against him all you hear was the debunking...??..
ADDITION to the ASKER (Rebuking):
Since I do tend to read more then just the ONE question you asked. I did check out the site that you posted, and also read a LOT of your question/answers. Since I deduced it would not matter what ANYONE would find to debunk the conspiracy theories, WHY in the world would I waste my time and energy?
I gave my 2 cents on the subject because just using common since would debunk the 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Heck a 5th grade education would even debunk it.
2006-06-07 18:25:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by lancelot682005 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The "Loose Change" video is a really slick production based on a conspiracy theory. There are people who think a missile hit the Pentagon, that explosives were used to implode the twin towers and United 93 was shot down. Oh, yes. They also think that the President knew about 9/11 in advance and did nothing and that all the Jews that worked in the World Trade Center stayed home that day. If you believe any of that sh*t, you need to up the dosage on your psychotropic drugs.
2006-06-07 18:20:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Radio Spy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
ignore each and each and every of the stuff pronounced contained in the flicks and use common sense. which may be the definitive. you are able to say regardless of you want to assert, yet that doesn't tutor that this authorities isn't protecting up . a million. in the starting up. you want a itemizing of websites, merely google 911, pentagon, flight ninety 3 and progression 7. 2. on that day, 3 homes fell onto their footprints at loose fall velocity. that isn't a logical component. someone pronounced that metal did not melt. I stated the unique information photos and stated molten metal. this isn't a logical component. 3. flight ninety 3. no wreckage, only a hollow contained in the floor. this isn't logical. 4. the pentagon. the recent reputable tale (there has been quite a few to objective to describe this adventure. a 757 grow to be highjacked with assistance from one guy whom might want to extremely fly a cesna and flew this large airplane over secure airspace, or perhaps as vacationing 2 ft above floor, managed to hit 7 undemanding posts and proceed its course onto the aspect of the pentagon which merely exceeded off to be less than protection. not a logical component. 5. cellular telephone calls from flight ninety 3.. comments of individuals calling from their cellphones even as vacationing at an altitude of 25,000 ft. A canadian scientist performed a try. He took different cellphones in a cesna and had a pilot fly an airplane, each and each and every of the even as finding out all cellphones to work out if there is reception. after 8,000, no cellular telephone labored. you commence to get my waft the following. If there is any conspiracy happening, it truly is the authorities who's performing it. human beings get aggravated at others who question the reputable report. They said as it unpatriotic. this isn't so! each and every man or woman ought to question this adventure, because not some thing has been defined with assistance from this bush administration. lack of comprehend-how is what retains human beings in THERE position. effortless sense rules. The 911 fee had none of it. How else can a fee bypass over the reasoning in the back of progression 7. human beings, you want to open your eyes.
2016-11-14 08:30:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Interesting
2006-06-07 18:00:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just watched it. Lot's of the "evidence" presented is laughable and easily debunked. However, some of it is compelling to say the least. They could have done without the music/spoken word bit, but I definitely think it raises some interesting and pertinent questions about 9/11.
I'm watching it again.
2006-06-07 19:30:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
very interesting. i've never been one to think about what happened on 9/11 either way. guess i'm just oe of the sheep in this country. thanks for the link though. i've passed it around and am waiting on feedback. should make for some very lively debates in my friends circle :-)
and thanks Ollie for the links too. i'll check those out to for sure. guess it's time to start thinking for myself huh.
2006-06-07 19:39:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by mystiminx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the videos of the Pentagon were released a couple of weeks ago. I don't know if they're online though.
2006-06-07 17:54:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by heterophobicgirl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anything is possible. Thank you for sharing the video with me.
2006-06-07 18:08:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by just julie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Omygod!!! I agree with lancelot
2006-06-07 18:29:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋