Apparently it's possitive. According to my research, I've found this: diddly-squat actually comes from early American carnival lingo as workers referred to nickels and dimes, the going rate for games of chances as "diddle-e-squat".
So, I guess it's worth nickels and dimes.....
2006-06-08 12:01:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Sky 6
·
8⤊
0⤋
Actually I think it's a positive zero (the only possible positive zero). That's because Diddly Squat is always an absolute value, so it couldn't be negative.
Are you sure it's not an irrational number?
2006-06-07 14:56:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Calimecita 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is Diddley constipated? His squats always end up as nothing.
2006-06-08 06:08:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by adieu 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither it would be 0 unless you specify you have "less than" Diddley squat then it would be negative. or "a little more than" Diddley Squat then it would be positive.
2006-06-07 14:56:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by ReddBratt 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think diddly squat is nothing and nothing is 0.
0 is neither negative or positive.
Diddly squat is = to jack squat but a little more than bubkiss.
2006-06-08 00:43:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ragdollfloozie is Pensive! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
negative number
2006-06-07 15:05:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by jc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a zero.
2006-06-07 14:54:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by bigrob 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
zero, nada, zilch, nothing.
2006-06-07 15:14:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sassy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
its neither
2006-06-07 15:58:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by swtmoney116 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
what!?
2006-06-07 15:03:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by snowgirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋