English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060607/ts_nm/life_coulter_dc

is she alone in this? i really hope so

2006-06-07 14:10:12 · 15 answers · asked by ski_bum_2006 2 in Politics & Government Politics

no problem mouse001.

2006-06-07 15:05:08 · update #1

15 answers

It takes one to know one. No seriously, this pisses me off. My sister was in the World Trade Tower 2 when it was bombed. We lost friends in that disaster and are still devasted by it. My sister will never be able to remove from her mind the images of people jumping to their deaths, what it felt like when the building was hit by the plane when she was still in the stairwell trying frantically to get out. Ann Coulter is a subhuman who sold her soul to the devil to sell books. She is a vile, angry form of life who is missing something inside that tells NORMAL people some things should never be said.

2006-06-07 14:17:23 · answer #1 · answered by edaem 4 · 1 0

ski bum- sorry bout the last answer (from the one you deleted), i read over the q again, and realized i had miss-interpreted what you meant. Based on that knowledge, now i say; She hates em', and thus has to be as immature as possible about the situation. (thus creative name-calling) It makes her feel better if she bitches about it. (and writing a book about something is a pretty big way to *****) So she picks out a metaphor like "witches". It's called PMS lol.....or menopause...:D (see, good example of what shes doing to those women, slander, and making fun of em') :D

But i do kinda see what she's pissed about. But one should never assume such a terrible thing with-out some..."proof" for lack or a better word. (have the women bought new gazillion dollar cars, and houses?)

2006-06-07 14:22:52 · answer #2 · answered by mouse001 4 · 0 0

Ann Coulter is a demagogue that gets her information incorrect and distorts the certainty extra commonly than Michael Moore. Her comments are heartless and vicious. She would desire to be publicly flogged, IMHO. a style of days she will positioned her foot in her mouth as quickly as too commonly and he or she is going to choke on it - basically wait and watch.

2016-10-30 09:26:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

She's scary even by Republican standards. Her insensitivity toward 9/11 widows is mind-boggling in my opinion. Her mean spiritied regurtiataion of the far-right party line is either her "schtick" or is a result of her being mentally ill (hypomanic with psychotic features), you can decide for yourself. All this as she "hawks" her new book. She doesn't have any credibility from anyone I know.

2006-06-07 14:38:49 · answer #4 · answered by Elusive 5 · 0 0

She is right. The widows entered the political arena they are now open to criticism Just because they are victims of a crime will not get them a free pass if they criticise the system we can answer back as hash as they speak, no free pass. Plus me I still don't understand why me the u.s. taxpayer paid for something that our enemys caused.

2006-06-07 14:37:02 · answer #5 · answered by retired_afmil 6 · 0 0

She tells it like it is and backs it up with actual quotes from the people she writes about - unlike liberal blogs that back up their points with other liberal blogs.
Liberals hate her because the facts and truth that she writes about get in the way of their arguments.
They can't attack her on the issues so they have to attack HER as a person.
Nice try libs but your ideas for running the country suck.

2006-06-07 16:45:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

She has her right to free speech like the rest of us. However, if she is saying these things to promote book sales then shame on her.

The 911 widows have as much right as her to voice their opinions and calling names is not making an argument.

2006-06-14 06:13:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

She is a horrid, hateful witch who will say anything to sell a few books. Disgusting. It's interesting that she criticizes them for being "professional victims," when she's nothing more than a professional mudslinger. I hope they sue her for slander.

2006-06-07 14:32:36 · answer #8 · answered by dannygirl 3 · 0 0

READ THE ARTICLE.

She is referring to 4 specific women who made millions due to their husbands deaths, and are using their fame and fortune for their own personal agendas.

2006-06-07 14:25:33 · answer #9 · answered by crookmatt 4 · 0 0

Wow! I heard there was some scuttlebutt but I didn't realize she came right out and said those things. That is pretty harsh!

2006-06-07 14:14:14 · answer #10 · answered by just a mom 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers