Do u support US interfering in other countries?

Question

*invading poor countries and telling them what to do
*hold a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons and blame other nations doing so

Answer 1

Yes i do because i'm glad the US intervened to stop the mass murder of jews during the holocaust of WWII. I want to be the force that stops genocide (like in darfour). I am willing to interfere if abuse of people is happening. Just like i would interfere in another family if i saw child abuse or a situation if i saw rape. I am willing to 'interfere' to stop injustice and torture and inhumanity. Not that US intervention always does that well. But in principle i am for that.

Answer 2

Yes! Invade North Korea and China! These countries have far worse cases of human rights violation and they have REAL weapons of mass destruction! But I bet George Bush has got NO balls sending troops to these nations.

Answer 3

if u have seen throughout history, one country has emerged as the world power, and the at present US hold the world power. This country usually has a obligation to interfere in world affairs for the benefit of other countries. that said, the US should know when to interfere and when not to, and i think the US might have over done this in the recent past.

Answer 4

Yes I support it because my cousin has been to afghanistan and served 2 years there. I would support ANYTHING a family is doing because I love them and that's what I feel the right thing to do is BUT I DO NOT AGREE with interfering with other countries business. I don't feel it's our place but we do need to protect our own country.

Answer 5

It seems to be a popular myth in the US that invading a foreign country is for the good of that country.
This is just a myth and should be shown up for what it is.
A bit like whipping the neighbour's kids because they're not as cute as your own.

Answer 6

yes, actually. by interfering in every possible aspect of the worlds nations we can keep ourselfs in power and those nukes keep those little gutsy countries "in line". fear and respect are our greatest weapons. if they fear us, theyll do what we wont, or wont do what we say no to. if they respect us the same thing happens. but the US is not going to just start bombing random civilian cities. thats why its okay for nukes to be in US control. i dont know, maybe i sound like i have a bias toward America.

Answer 7

Do I think we should interfere with other countries, no. But, the US is allies with most countries and if they ask for our help, we are going to help our allies. The US has to protect itself, if we got rid of our nuclear weapons, and we were attacked by another country that has them and we were not aware of them having them, how would we defend ourselves against that. We are the most powerful country on earth.

Answer 8

1. Iraqi's in large numbers are happy that they have been liberated and can now form their democracy.
2. Do you really want a national leader like the leader in Iran who has publicly announced he wants to wipe millions of people off the face of the earth to have the capability to do so?

Why don't you grow up, and think about the situations before buying into propaganda.

Answer 9

Of course not!How could anyone!We now understand that the US has been using these strong armed tactics for quite some time.It's apart of the way the US has become a powerhouse in the world.....You 've got something I want(oil)I will bomb so & so the guys you don't like.To insure I can get the something I want.It doesn't matter who gets hurt in the process.US soldiers,inocent civillions?

Answer 10

that is a solid question. The U.S. needs to impose its way of thinking on different cultures yet it is comparable to working the international. The U.S. already has militia and intelligence domination over the planet. There would desire to be some thank you to end the insanity of conflict. possibly if the U.N. moved out of long island to Geneva it would be no longer particularly common for the U.S. to dominate their judgements. If Latin usa formed an financial union and stopped the exploitation of its factors by ability of the U.S. companies, it would help to end American hegemony. The media would desire to record particularly on each thing that is going on like in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. rather of reporting the certainty, American media places those instigators on television to effect the yank public. Thank Goodness for RT and al Jazeera.