In your opinion who is a better player? Dwyane Wade or Dirk Nowitzki?

Question

explain why u think your choice is better and be honest.

Answer 1

Its hard to compare different player since they all have different style and different position.

Given the performance of Dwyane and Dirk on the last few games, you can say for sure that both of them are exceptional players. We can definitely expect them to give us a great game for the final on Thursday ^o^

However if they were put against on a one-on-one situation, I would bet my money on Dwyane instead of Dirk. Dwyane moves fast and his movement are very well executed, I believe he is a more all-around player compare to Dirk.

Dwyane has the ability to hold his own without the help of his temmates, break through defense on his own and create his own chances whereas Dirk needs help from teammate to pass the ball or do plays to score.

Just my two cents~

Answer 2

Saying Dirk can do the same thing as wade is ridiculous. Dirk and Wade are equal offensively, however Dirk is terrible, a liability even on defense. People do not pay attention to defense, no one seems to care. Players have made their careers on defense and nothing else. Ben Wallace, Bruce Bowen. Those two barely can do anything else but defend and they start every game. Wade is so good defensively even if he couldn't score one point, he'd still be on the floor for 30 minutes. Dirk would be non-existent if he couldn't score, a third string center maybe. Wade wins this competition hands down.

Edit:
How Bowen playe defense on Dirk has nothing to do with how Dwayne Wade is better defensively than Dirk. So who's dumb?

Dirk would also not be in the finals without Josh Howard or any other starter on the team. Shaq has had his worst season by far and Wade has lead them to the finals, not Shaq. Shaq is still the most dominant player in basketball, but he is no longer the best. Dirk is a great competitor, a great shooter, and he causes major matchup issues, but he will never be considered a better defender than Wade.

Answer 3

Dirk's better. Without Shaq, I don't think Dwyane Wade's in the Finals now.

Answer 4

Whetz...you're dumb.

Bruce Bowen did a great job on Dirk, huh??? What, he averaged like 29 a game in that series???

Anyways, Dirk has played good enough defense to get his team to the Finals and that's what matters!! Also, don't discount rebounds as playing defense? Everyone insists that grabbing a defense rebound is just as good as a defensive stop and he has averaged 12 a game this entire postseason.

Little Miss asking the question...answer yourself this question and I think it will answer your own.

"Would Wade be in the finals if Shaq was not on his team? (IMO=hell no)...Would Dirk if say...(IMO=hell yeah)."

Diggler will show how much better he is than Wade soon.

Answer 5

I have seen dirk play more because i watch the suns games. And i Hate him even though he had 50 points one of the games. I dont watch dwayne play that much. But based on what i heard everyone say about wade i think he is better.

Answer 6

The first answer is somewhat correct but you can compare them as basketball players in general. I would say Dirk because he can do just about the same things as Wade but he is 7 foot.

Answer 7

dirk because he can carry his whole team to victory. if wade didnt have shaq he wouldnt of even made the playoffs.

Answer 8

Sorry Girl. They play different positions so you can't really compare them. It would be similar to comparing a pitcher and third baseman in baseball.

Answer 9

dwayne wade fo sho...but nowitzki is good also...we'll see in tomorrows game!!!