Tell us where YOU live first, than I will answer.
2006-06-07 09:33:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by alieneddiexxx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
By nuking the country, is it just one nuke or a whole bunch of nukes to totally decimate the country? This makes a large difference in my decision.
2006-06-07 16:10:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Goose&Tonic 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off, It would be insane to use nukes in any way, shape or form.
But if one was to use them, it would be logical to punish the most violent contry in the world that does the most damage to human life, the envivoment and peace. Now, who could that be.....?
I'd pick washington DC
2006-06-07 16:47:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Imaginer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
France.
Because of the French Revolution, it brought us the Reign of Terror and the roots for communism. Communism has killed over 100 million people.
And they started the 10,000 day war (aka Vietnam war).
Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot were educated in a French University
2006-06-07 16:24:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by SP_Rider 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not a pretty question; for there is no nation on the earth who's people should suffer such a devasting destruction (not even the "county" of San Francisco - in reference to a previous answer).
Perhaps you should restate; if we could remove one government on the planet with out hurting their people which would it be...my answer is China...eventually they will turn on the planet.
2006-06-07 16:09:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would not nuke any country.
2006-06-07 15:58:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by sassyk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
San Francisco because CA would be so much better without it and all the people in Oakland could have unobstructed ocean views.
2006-06-07 15:57:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
None. I don't want to go to Hell.
2006-06-07 16:34:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by A B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
None.
2006-06-07 16:15:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are idiot
2006-06-07 15:56:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
0⤊
0⤋