English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WAS THE WAR ON IRAQ NECESSARY? AND DO U SUPPORT BUSH? DO YOU LIKE ATTACKING IRAN?

2006-06-07 08:44:40 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Probably not.
Yes and No. If Al Gore was president, nothing would have been done after 09/11/2001, just like Bill Clinton did nothing after the 1993 WTC bombing.
If Iran want to join the Nuke Club, they should be ready to "glow in the dark".

2006-06-07 08:56:08 · answer #1 · answered by SP_Rider 3 · 1 0

No, No, and No.

Question 1. The war in Iraq was based on lies. The original "reason" for the war according to Conservatives, was they thought Iraq had WMD.Some even promised they did. Even if they did, it would have been un necessary, simply because the UN was already there searching for WMD. If there were any, the UN would have found them, and destroyed them. We just so happened to tell the UN to leave, so we could do the buisiness. Not for nothing, but it was not our buisiness to go there. If there were any WMD which there weren't, the UN would have and could have taken care of it. Also, do you really think Iraq could attack us or Europe? NO. Israel? They could, but the number of Muslims, and soveriegnty supporters in Israel is real high. They would kill thousands of muslims too, and even part of Palestine.. Yeah, that would work. Not. Anyways, point being, the UN was there.. They were dealing with it. We should have given them a few months, and then decided. It wasn't about throwing Saddam out. That was Bush's excuse to the American people. Is it good that Iraq is now a free country? Yes. However, did the way America do it was right? No. Crime has only increased in Iraq since the war. The death toll is higher then it ever was with Saddam in power. Are we really withdrawing troops from Iraq? No. If we were, why did we just deploy an additional 1500?

2. Do I support Bush? Absolutely not. He lied to the American people. He isn't willing to compromise with anyone either. He gives the people in Iraq one option.. To agree with him. He won't compromise with the Sunnis, Shites, and Kurds. He won't at least try to discuss talks with al Qidea. Lastly, he won't admit that he made a mistake and take responsibility. He isn't wanting to exit either. Set aside from the war in Iraq.. He has refused to listen to the American people. He is homophobic, racist, and he won't admit to his mistakes. He will cut taxes by 70 Billion, yet the poverty rate is increasing. With 40 billion, he could literally bring over 120 million people to school.. That could stop poverty in Africa, Asia, and other continents. He could put that money towards medicade. He could put it towards social security. He could put it toward adding more police. Yet he doesn't.

3. Should we attack Iran? ABSOLUTELY NOT. If we do, I swear to you that I will attempt every possible way to leave this country. It's not that I don't love it, or that I want to leave, but it would be because I wouldn't want to be drafted. Iraq has 28 million people. Iran has over 68 million. They have a more powerful military, and they have more people willing to stick up for their country. If we attack Iran, trust me, we will totally loose. We can't afford to be in 2 countries. Not to mention that most countries would not help. If we went to Iran, our country would work like Israel, where every has to be in the military for a certain amount of time. Do we really want that to happen? No. Not at all.

No, the war in Iraq was not necessary. No, I don't support Bush. No, I don't like the idea of us attacking Iran.

2006-06-07 17:31:50 · answer #2 · answered by Jacques 3 · 0 0

No the war in Iraq was not necessary. It was foolish, stupid and illegal

I can't stand the man. I never voted for him or his father. Right now there are 2,708 dead military, one of them returns here shortly for burial. All for some lousy oil!!

Attacking Iran would be crazier than attacking Iraq!! It is 3 times the size of Iraq, we have been warned by China and Russia to keep our hands off, and I believe we should butt out. Bush would have to bypass the UN Security Counsel again, and most here would not stand for it, I don't think he could get the votes or financing from Republicans. Its an election year! And we don't have the troops. We would need to use a nuke, which is beyond the worse thing that could ever be done.

We should butt out of other peoples business!!

2006-06-07 15:57:00 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

The war was unfortunately necessary. And it has been successful so far.

I support Bush, for the most part.

Attacking Iran? We're not attacking Iran. We are, however, the only country willing to threaten repercussions (economic, etc) against Iran if they do not stop developing nukes. Again, it may be unfortunately found necessary to take stronger (military) action to get them to stop. I sure with the rest of the world who wants them to stop would step up to the plate. Why does the US and Britain have to do all the heavy lifting?

2006-06-07 16:25:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No it wasn't necessary, I support Bush as the President, but not his policy, I respect Iran as a sovereign country.

2006-06-07 15:48:00 · answer #5 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0 0

Yes, it was/is necessary.

Yes, I support Bush.

No, I don't "like" attacking Iran, but if they are going to develope nuclear technology, against the will of the rest of the world, then we may have to attack them to make this world more safe.

---

You are not going to get a good ratio of people here. There are too many liberals who are sitting home waiting on their welfare check on here.

kyle-(below), I'm sorry you are the victim of lies. You unfortunately are brought up by a liberal who does not know any better. Read this link
http://tinyurl.com/3btfn
It will show everything you just said was based on liberal lies.
I was going to email this to you, but your email was off. Good luck learning facts. it will be hard in your household.

2006-06-07 15:51:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No
No
We haven't attacked Iran.

2006-06-07 15:52:20 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0 0

The US put Saddam in power.Yes it was necessary.
Did support the war. No do not support him on immigration
We have not attacked Iran

2006-06-07 15:54:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mr. Bush is doing what he feels is right in an unstable Middle East. All you need to do is look at a map.
Bush is thinking about our future security issues.

2006-06-07 15:50:17 · answer #9 · answered by avenger 3 · 0 0

not necessary. hate the whole bush family. iran can di what they want. iran, its like cutting off your hands because i think you might hit me.

2006-06-07 15:55:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers