Why won't America sign the kyoto agreement?

Answer 1

simple: it will be bad for the energy businesses. It will cost a lot of money to bring up standards and they don't want to pay for it.

Answer 2

Because it would hurt our economy, and would have very little impact. The estimated impact of the treaty would be a less than 1% reduction in the supposed problem emissions, which isn't enough to do anything. We should ruin our economy for that?

Kyoto also allows other countries to keep pumping out emissions; it seems aimed mostly at developed Western countries. Kyoto was rejected in a bipartisan vote in the Senate. Bush just did the sensible thing and tossed it out.

It was a useless document that didn't fix the problem but involved huge costs. That's why the signatory countries aren't complying, either.

Answer 3

Simply put, the Kyoto agreement puts America on an unequal playing field with non-Kyoto nations. Many other nations in the world, including Great Britain, are turning their backs on Kyoto in favor of internal regulations. We need to have all resources available if we wish to win the economic war. Kyoto just limits us.

Read More of My Thoughts- www.rightontheright.com

Answer 4

There is no concrete proof that the Kyoto agreement will solve the problem of global warming

Answer 5

They are the NUMBER 1 polution nation. They cant just sign the agreement, they'll have to stop industry and all that sh*t....then, at this time, if they sign, they wont be first nation in the world...they are the number 1 pollution nation...mymadsky (the next answer) is just trying to protect...
Im not saying that the others are not polluting...americans just dont wanna be in deep sh*t

Answer 6

Because America is run by the businesmen who use all this energy. Plus the Americans are a very insular race who do not think of anyone else but themselves. Did you know 95% of the population do not hold a passport?

Answer 7

The Pope condemns the climate exchange prophets of doom by ability of SIMON CALDWELL - extra by ability of this author » final as much as date at 14:48pm on twelfth December 2007 comments comments Pope Benedict XVI attack: Pope Benedict criticised climate-exchange prophets of doom Pope Benedict XVI has released a marvel attack on climate exchange prophets of doom, warning them that any recommendations to international warming would desire to be in line with business enterprise information and not on doubtful ideology. The chief of extra suitable than one billion Roman Catholics stated that fears over guy-made emissions melting the ice caps and inflicting a wave of remarkable failures weren't something extra suitable than scare-mongering. The German-born Pontiff reported that on a similar time as some concerns could be valid it became considered necessary that the international community based its rules on technology quite than the dogma of the environmentalist stream. His comments would be made in his annual message for international Peace Day on January a million, yet they have been released as delegates from around the international convened on the Indonesian holiday island of Bali for UN climate exchange talks. The eighty-twelve months-previous Pope reported the international had to look after the ambience yet to no longer the factor the place the welfare of animals and flowers became given a miles better priority than that of mankind.

Answer 8

Because, America likes to be different. And now my country, Canada, thanks to our new PM Stephan Harper, wants out of the Kyoto Agreement. WHAT A RETARD.

Answer 9

This Allgore treaty imposes sanctions and limits on the US and to a lesser degree Canada and Europe. Wreck our economy which is based on cheap energy in return for moving even more jobs and mfg offshore to countries not sanctioned? Doesn't sound like a good plan to me.

Answer 10

It puts limits on the USA while it doesn't limit others. In short, it is biased...
Have you read the agreement it in it's whole?

Oh and Matt ...China is the worlds largest polluter followed by Europe then the USA then India (though India is moving up the ladder fast)

Answer 11

For a lot of reasons, one of which is that it allows the creation of an UNEVEN playing field whereby other countries do NOT have to adhere to the same environmental standards as we would have to. What, so their pollution is not as "bad" as ours? Did you ever voluntarily go into a fight (physical or economic) with one hand tied behind your back?