Tell me how the Indian Democracy has been functioning since 1950 within 200-300 words maximum
2006-06-07 06:11:50 · 8 answers · asked by Antsan 2 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Indian Democracy can be called as biggest experiment of 20th century. On line with British Parliament, India choose to have monumental head of state with all powers with Prime Minister led Government which enjoy majority in lower house of parliament. Being largest democracy in world, there were lot of challenges starting from making aware people aware of their rights to make democracy successful. If we think in retrospective we will find that Indian democracy has been partially successful. Though there is lot to show like democracy prevailed in India and there were no instances of dictatorship as happened in neighbouring countries, also we got a lot from developing social democratic structure with government stake in base industry to enabling private ownership in other sectors, green revolution, advances in space, nuclear and other research, going towards IT Giant so despite lot of hue and cry, we have achieved a lot however on flip side we have piled up corruption, lethargy, red tapism, inspector raj, sofa set leaders and so on.
Now it is crucial time to rethink and remove these black spots from our democracy and make it all successful democracy. Good luck to all of us.
2006-06-08 10:43:36 · answer #1 · answered by Jigyasu Prani 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In a way Indian Democracy is as old as India. Most Indian Kings ruled India Benevolently and they always try to get peoples opinion...To day India is corrupt because of the so called western democratic system
2006-06-19 18:28:28 · answer #2 · answered by babu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you really heard someone say "America is a democracy" they were either lying or stupid... The USA is a Democratic REPUBLIC.....you elect Representatives by "direct democracy", and then those Representatives are OBLIGED BY LAW to vote as THEY see fit, not as a majority of their constituents might want... If your Founders had intended a "direct democracy" with mob rule, you would have a Parliamentary Democracy rather than a Democratic Republic....
2016-03-26 21:49:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well..it has been functioning..but just FUNCTIONING..! not doin any good to nyone..! after the qouta's being issued...it's not worth calling it a democracy..!:( im an indian..and am pretty sad about the way things are turning out...although india is booming in growth..it's not helping out the social sectors..!
2006-06-15 10:19:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I respectfully invoke my 5th amendment rights as my answer may tend to incriminate myself
2006-06-07 06:13:39 · answer #5 · answered by intresting fellow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
read history of india by jawaharlal nehru
2006-06-16 19:46:18 · answer #6 · answered by RAJA R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
seriously u dont wanna know
2006-06-07 06:22:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it has ????????
2006-06-07 06:15:53 · answer #8 · answered by U 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋