B I T C H ???
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/424405p-358034c.html
2006-06-07
06:09:46
·
17 answers
·
asked by
silv2078
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Free country and all... she has no right to be so condecending to people who lost some one in a tragedy. I'd like to see how she reacts when someone so close to her dies in such a horrible manner.
2006-06-07
06:14:42 ·
update #1
don't want censorship...just compasion which she shows none of in this latest stunt. People ask me to look at facts and read her books...blah blah... well she's not doing a great job at fact checking herself if she's going to slander people like she has in this latest incident.
2006-06-07
06:27:05 ·
update #2
Ann Coulter is a 45 year old spinster, who has never had a serious relationship nor had any children. Probably due to the fact that she is has Androgen Insensitive syndrome which is when Males and females usually have at least one X chromosome that contains a gene that makes their body react to androgen's. If this gene is faulty, a child will have male internal organs but develop a female external appearance.
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=14428
I believe Ann has the right of freedom of speech, However, She cannot even fathom the loss of any loved one. She proclaims to be a devout Christian. Ann's brand of Christianity is cruel, judgmental, prejudice and she has no facts to back up her claimes about how those women feel (I hope they sue her for Slander)....I blame the Today Show for allowing her to spew her hatred not Ann...She has every right to be hateful...and you have every right to ignore her!
2006-06-07 06:56:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Meemers 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
In "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," the uncompromisingly right-wing Coulter writes the Jersey Girls have no right to criticize President Bush or any of the failures that led to the terror attacks.
"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis," Coulter writes.
"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy. . .
"These self-obsessed women seemed genuinely unaware that 9/11 was an attack on our nation and acted as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them."
Yeah, I'd say she's a *****.
Lucky, how can I respect her for her writing abilities when she doesn't even write for herself? In her first book, High Crimes and Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton, there are portions she has been accused of plagiarizing from the work of Michael Chapman, a man with whom she had formerly worked but later claimed never to have met.
2006-06-07 13:16:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sadly, some people just are. As much as I'd prefer that she crawl back under her rock, I have to support her right to free speech, which in turn gives me the freedom to call her out for what she is, a spoiled, priveledged, political barbie blind for bush. She cannot answer a question clearly and the more the interviewer strives for clarity the louder and more hysterical she will become. And who the hell wears a freaking cocktail dress at 8 am?!?!?! There's credibility for you. I kinda get a kick out of trying to find a point to her madness...but I agree she's a madwoman.
2006-06-07 13:18:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The same reason Michael Moore, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and chuck Schumer can. AND do frequently.
It's a free country. But do you really want censorship? Or do you only want censorship to those who disagree with what your side says.
God (Yes I said the G word) Save me from extremes from both sides.
2006-06-07 13:22:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm glad someone didn't swallow the lines the media feed us without a second thought and she took time to dig in and investigate the story a little.
Kudos to Ann!
2006-06-07 13:26:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by irishharpist 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
as the father of 3 daughters 2 grand daughters an 1 great grand daughter wish you would refrain from referring to a lady as a female dog now to try and shine a light into your darkness some see her as and educated accomplished novelist regardless of what you think of what she writes you have to show respect for her doing it
2006-06-07 13:16:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She's a racist, a homophobe, she advocates the killing or people that don't agree with her, she advocates terrorist acts against the NY Times, in short she's just a hateful little worm. I think that's why she appeals to the rightwing kool-aid drinkers.
2006-06-07 13:17:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LIBERALS ARE GOOD! that said,it is because Anne Coulter is just
born to be the kind of naturally evil see you next Tuesday.
Anne Coulter is living proof conservative men are hateful and stupid.
2006-06-07 13:35:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are some Liberals really as open minded as they think they are? Question yourself. What if some Republican through a pie in your face? What would you do? Would you become a ***** or be nice to them?
Understand?
2006-06-07 13:31:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stacks the Architect 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Before you judge her, have you read any of her books? Likely not, probably way over your poor little liberal head. I enjoy her books, I love her sarcastic sense of humor and I respect her immensely for standing up to liberals. You should broaden your horizons read one of her books, I just bought the newest this morning and look forward to reading it!!!
2006-06-07 13:14:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋