English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

SWAKOPMUND, Namibia - Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt denied Wednesday that wedding bells are in the air, saying they want to concentrate for now on their newborn daughter and Jolie's two adopted children.

"There is nothing in the air. The focus is the kids, and we are obviously extremely committed to the children and as parents together," Jolie told a news conference. "So that kind of says it for us, and to have a ceremony on top of it is nothing."

Meanwhile, in London, People and Hello! magazines launched legal action Wednesday against two Web sites that published a picture of Jolie and Pitt with their newborn daughter.

Pitt and Jolie sold rights to the images of Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt, born May 27 in Namibia, through Getty Images photo agency. The couple said all proceeds would be donated to a charity, not yet named.

People magazine paid a reported $4 million for the right to release the pictures in North America, while Hello! obtained British rights.

2006-06-07 05:58:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

8 answers

You would think that they are the first people EVER to have a child.

2006-06-07 06:02:02 · answer #1 · answered by Fool in the Rain 6 · 2 0

I think it's HYSTERICAL that they named the kid Shiloh Pitt, because if you turn it around it sounds like "pile o' s-h-i-t" ROTFLMAO

I think because they are rich, white and good-looking, way way way too much attention is being paid to them. I also think that the way the media hypes BABIES! BABIES! BABIES! all the time is indicative of a pronatalist agenda which is sexist at core. It wrongly equates all women as mothers, and insists that the best and only worthwhile thing a woman can do is have a child. This is so wrong, so narrow, so limiting, so backward.

I make it a point not to buy any magazine whatsoever that trumpets anything about celebrities dating, celebrities marrying, celebrities divorcing or celebrities having babies. WHO CARES? All I care about is do they do good work when they make a movie or a television show? I don't care about their personal lives, and they deserve privacy like all of us.

Part of this attitude comes from having moved from fly-over land to Los Angeles. I really don't want to know anything about celebrities other than their professional work.

Cheers, K, who knows up close and personal that Hollywood is dingy, dirty, unglamorous and very, very manufactured and utterly fake

2006-06-07 06:08:00 · answer #2 · answered by Kate 4 · 0 0

All I can say is that the Jolie-Pitts are donating the money to charities and that is comendable. People are just naturally nosy. Especially the ones that have no life.

2006-06-07 06:33:55 · answer #3 · answered by missy 4 · 0 0

4 million dollars for the pictures of a baby! OMG all newborns look the same to me, typical celebrity obsessive nonsence well at least the money is going to be used for a good cause.

2006-06-07 06:06:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It sounds like any other celeb baby. There is a high demand for pics of the baby made from (in some ppls' opinion) the two most beautiful ppl on earth.

2006-06-07 06:02:27 · answer #5 · answered by Luna 5 · 0 0

The only thing I could say is America get a life.

2006-06-07 06:15:45 · answer #6 · answered by Robertus911 3 · 0 0

Stupid,,,,, what about Billy Bob giving up custody to the other 2... ridiculous.. all about the press..

2006-06-07 06:02:19 · answer #7 · answered by cutienoz 3 · 0 0

i think they are acting pretty anxious to see what thier baby looks like. i heard that some of them went to extreme lengths by going to africa.

2006-06-07 06:02:21 · answer #8 · answered by *Spirited - Obssessions* 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers