If President Bush has his way, will the North American Union replace the United States of America?

Question

Is President Bush pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, which would effectively erase our borders with both Mexico and Canada? Is this potential act of treason the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy?

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965

Answer 1

Why do you have to make such an idiotic ignorant statement?

Answer 2

Much as I do not appreciate the current President, I will have to defend him. It is not Bush. The Globilization of business has been going on for a generation and we are now reaching the apex. This globilization policy has put millions out of work in the US while other countries have benefited from the downsourcing. Hundreds of cities and towns are bankrupted and may cease to exist but although this will decimate a generation it most likely will lead to a possible world peace, global language among its benefits. Our children will reap the profits, not us. As far as I can see...open borders is a policy that the last FEW administrations has pursued.

Answer 3

i'm an Obama supporter and those are my thoughts: i love Ron Paul even even with the actuality that i do not inevitably trust Libertarianism and the first one to target it ought to likely see extreme aftereffects and the conception will bypass down in flames. i'm thirty years previous and this may be the first election I vote in. I quite have always felt that there is a 2 get mutually phantasm in this united states and the wealthy positioned who they want in place of work. It quite scares me that Obama were given as far as he has and yet, he seems so authentic. How did he destroy by the duality? Ron Paul ought to were a much more suitable desirable opponent for Obama and ought to have made him sweat slightly. i do not comprehend how McCain is so extreme interior the polls at the same time as Bush became so low. i guess people as a rule are stupid and it truly is the same those who voted for Bush 2 circumstances! Republicans comprehend in the adventure that they vote for Ron Paul it is going to likely be a wasted vote, that is why Independents do not get many votes. they are afraid in the adventure that they boost some balls and vote for him, that the worser of the assumed 2 evils receives the white domicile. until eventually we can convince more suitable people to vote self reliant and stay faraway from the activities, this duality will proceed.

Answer 4

Nope. Because luckily for the USA the President doesn't make all the calls. We have the House & Congress that he has to also get agreeance from, and they disagree with everything. LOL

Bush is very against opening the boarders, especially being From Texas, where the border is a huge problem.

Answer 5

Hmmm.globalist agenda.WELL CIVICS 101.laws are made in congress,The senate and The house .The president can sign and pass The law or veto it ,which can be over-turned by a 2/3 majority in congress.The president can neither make OR pass law himself.The only example of a globalist agenda present to day is Islam trying to impose it's religion on the world.check history it did not work for Charlemagne and it will not work for Islam i don't care how many people they kill.Charlemagne kill hundreds of thousand and failed.also in 18th dynasty a Pharaoh tried it with Egypt ,Tut's father (he failed also)Ankhs Nah mum.not sure of spelling of Pharaohs name

Answer 6

Don't believe all you read! If I posted somewhere on the internet that Bill Clinton was an agent of the Chinese government, would you believe that too?

Answer 7

God, I hope not. Nothing against Americans, but I like being Canadian. We're much the same but there are some very real differences.

Answer 8

liberal idiots