Bush The one---Dic*Head is having them in white house
2006-06-07 00:45:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nav 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, let us get the facts straight
- Iraq had WMD and had used them both against the Iranians and the Kurds.
- The UN inspectors were not there looking for WMD, but were there to verify and oversee that Iraq had accounted for and had destroyed all the WMD they had, and documented it. They were also checking to make sure the WMD labs were being dismantled.
The UN inspectors were prevented from verifying the destruction of all his WMD. This is why every intelligence agency in the world believed he still had chemical weapons stockpiled.
The problem is the Iraqis never accounted for all the biological and chemical weapons they'd stockpiled. What went unreported were nerve agents and biological agents.
There is some evidence the WMD that was not documented as destroyed was shipped to Syria, while the coalition troops were deploying on the Iraqi border.
It's a good question, but let's not play the fool and delude ourselves that he never had any in the first place. That is at odds with the documented facts.
2006-06-07 00:57:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There never was any. The only weapons Iraq had were the ones supplied to them by America to fight Iran.
2006-06-07 00:44:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by liam 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't know Syria,Jordon,Iran,or the dessert some where.My fear is that when we find out it will be because some radical fraction of Islam is using them for the purpose they were made, to kill people and I hope those that cry when innocent people die will save a tear for the victims.Chemical and bio-weapons kill wholesale women,children,young,old,military,and civilian. But in about 20 years when the containers start to deteriorate they will be found
2006-06-07 00:49:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It still amazes me that even after so long you Americans still believe all the crap that your leaders told you so you will be willing to go to Iraq. Face it... there were no chemical weapons no missiles nothing. Your leaders fooled you, and laugh all the way to the bank while you naively go and kill people and being killed believing their lies.
2006-06-07 00:48:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kimon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
they were taken to syria or iran, the russians helped them move the weapons. russians were recorded helping iraq remove weapons from iraq but they wont show on national tv because dont want to disrupt US diplomacy with russia.
2006-06-07 00:47:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by crackalac 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In Bush's stomach
2006-06-07 00:41:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by vaishak k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no, Bush use it for reason to attack Iraq for oil..
2006-06-07 00:41:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by gooddjinn 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
U should ask Bush this question
but its obvious there were none
2006-06-07 00:45:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by SuGaR LiPs 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
they used them all up on the Kurds and Iranians. by the time the US got there, they were all gone.
2006-06-07 00:40:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋