English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

0% = I don't beleive what the goverment said
5% = maybe there a chance s/he dangerous
100% = I believe s/he will 100% molested another child

2006-06-06 21:40:57 · 15 answers · asked by nk_rso 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

change the 5% to 50%

2006-06-06 21:41:34 · update #1

check my profile for other sex offender question . I wanna hear your answer

2006-06-06 21:45:33 · update #2

15 answers

1% chance of that happening

so Im not THAT worry like the others

2006-06-11 17:55:01 · answer #1 · answered by n K 4 · 1 3

Such a notice should be taken seriously but get the facts. Find out for yourself what the offense is before making a decision. A government agency's definition of dangerous is far too broad to take at face value.

Many dangerous offenders, as part of their parole, are prohibitted from living near small children, even their own. So again, check the facts and make an informed decision.

2006-06-07 00:33:49 · answer #2 · answered by Got a Plan 3 · 1 0

0% I don't believe what the Government says because I read their inflated statistics continuously. The pull these statistics out of their A**.

I would meet the person, get to know them and make up my own mind. The Government will never control my mind. God tells me how to treat people and that is who I follow. The Greater Power and he is ashamed of what this country has become with these sex offender issues!

2006-06-07 05:41:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I vote AwesomeBill, truly awesome!
have the people lost their common sense? why do you need the government telling you what to do, or to trust it or not?
McDonalds cant serve big portions, Doctor must give you 10 pills a day, now the sex offender next door is dangerous. Common sense tells us McDonalds is fattening and unhealthy..don't eat too much, pills cant do everything and cant substitute healthy eating and living, and if a sex offender lives next door, don't go alone over at his house at night for coffee (especially if you're a woman) and don't let him babysit your kids!

come on people, you don't have to have a degree in this and you don't need to be a rocket scientist!

2006-06-06 21:56:07 · answer #4 · answered by mimi 2 · 1 0

Yes I believe them 100% that a sex offender is there. Here in Phoenix, they send a flyer when that occurs to everyone in the immediate area including their picture.

Now do I believe they will commit a similar crime? I personally think maybe 75% will but the statistics indicate it at about 95%.

2006-06-07 13:57:35 · answer #5 · answered by NoJail4You 4 · 0 1

the two significant methods anal intercourse could be risky could be injury and ailment/STD hazards. the two a style of could be minimized and condoms could join that plan. Anal intercourse could be a secure and gratifying journey in case you maintain some issues in innovations. SFSI's FAQ (see link below) provides lots of information, however the perfect innovations are communique, lubrication, staying power, and risk-free practices. Anal tissue is skinny and would tear genuinely. Use lots of lube, make the effort, and end if there is any soreness. while you're utilising a condom, make certain you employ water-based lube with a latex condom; in case you want to apply an oil-based lube, be useful to apply a polyurethane condom rather of a latex condom. There are some concerns approximately feces for the period of anal intercourse and the transmission of illnesses. usually, washing around the anus with heat water and cleansing soap is sufficient for doing away with micro organism. in case you or your spouse are in contact approximately poop, some human beings experience extra gentle having anal intercourse after having an enema. bear in mind that there are some micro organism interior the anal tract that would desire to no longer get into the vagina. utilising a condom can shrink the prospect of moving micro organism into the vagina after anal intercourse with the aid of fact which you may exchange to a sparkling condom without having to end and wash. Condoms could be powerful in combating the transmission of STDs. The SF city medical institution threat Chart lists many STDs which could be transmitted for the period of anal intercourse which comprise gonorrhea, chlamydia, HIV, herpes, and syphilis. If neither spouse has an STD, then you definately are no longer in possibility.

2016-10-30 08:34:53 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yep. There have been many years of study that has gone into decions about levels of sex offenders, likelihood to repeat, treatment etc. If I am told a Level 3 is living next to me, I sure as HE## am going to pay attention and move.

2006-06-08 21:36:14 · answer #7 · answered by amandasmama 4 · 0 1

50%...I believe that the government would have no reason to lie about the fact that the offender lives there, but I don't trust that they would protect us from the offender at all times...depends on what you mean by trust I guess.

2006-06-06 21:45:03 · answer #8 · answered by stacey 5 · 0 1

sorry to say, but i believe with the 100% because many sex offenders will offend again. its a proven fact.

2006-06-06 21:43:27 · answer #9 · answered by tiggerkitty3 4 · 0 1

You should believe it. Not that you should haras the neighbor but be aware that something could happen so do not take chanses. They are around and they quite often repeat their actions. Why would the governmenat lie about this?

2006-06-06 22:17:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

100% if s/he gets the chance

2006-06-06 21:44:28 · answer #11 · answered by Track Walker 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers