2006-06-06 20:13:45 · 20 answers · asked by anonymous 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He has brought democracy to the Middle East, security to our allies and taught a valuable lesson to those liberal traitors who hate America more than anything else. He should have at least as many Nobel Prizes as Carter, who didn't do anything but pay ransom to the terrorists who started this whole damned mess!
2006-06-07 07:15:35 · answer #1 · answered by plutocheshire 2 · 1⤊ 8⤋
The worst President was Jimmy Carter. People who dislike capitalism sure have prospered off of it and it beats socialism so go live in another country. He deserves the Nobel Peac Prize.
2006-06-06 20:19:35 · answer #2 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not agree with you at all.
He has not done anything to help any of the countries of the world work out their differences with a peaceful solution. His solution is to send our military over to these countries whom have been at war since the time Jesus Christ walked the earth, as a deterrent he says to terrorism, when all we are doing is spending money,taking our protection away from us when we have been viciously attacked, and getting our soldiers into situations where they are being brought up on charges of murder!
You give a person a weapon, send then into a country where they are hated and targeted everyday to be killed, and are being killed in front of their eyes, and yeah something is going to go out of control.
We are putting our people into a war that is not ours. And regardless of what Congress has officially sanctioned this is war we are involved in. Why are we going to put good men on trial for doing what they were ordered to do! They were sent to protect and root out all terrorists and put them out of commission.
They were attacked, they rooted out the people who led the attack and they put the threat out of commission.
War is ugly, war is nasty, and it is not something where you are in control of every thing you are ordered to do!
I am finished now, not because I have no more to say, but because it has all been said before. We cannot stand 2 more years of Bush leadership! We will be completely at the mercy of our creditors if we are not already. They own most of our manufacturing plants now, what will we do if they forclose on our debts we cannot pay back? I hope we can take bankruptcy on the global level!
2006-06-06 20:52:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think so
what peace r u talking about ?
in Iraq or in Palestine or the next war in Iran?
he started many wars he does not deserve any prize for that
2006-06-06 23:08:57 · answer #4 · answered by SuGaR LiPs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly not - making a war is hardly creating peace, now, is it?
OK so Saddam has gone, but instead we have a whole lot of very angry people just waiting to take his place. George Bush doesn't fight wars for peace and democracy, he fights for oil.
2006-06-06 20:17:08 · answer #5 · answered by squimberley 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he isn't a person who combat for the peace of the sector. he's a person who spoiled peace of 1 nation. as an indian even though we suffered plenty by way of our neighbouring counrtries for a beyond five a long time we consistently check out for the peace of our country he input into an additional nation and not directly dominated the nation so i dont agree
2016-09-08 21:45:05 · answer #6 · answered by vite 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think George W. Bush deserves a good kick in the ***!
And Toby Keith should be the one to give it to him!....."it's the AMERICAN way!!"
One side question, are you old enough to vote? Did you vote for him in the last election? If so, I'll send Toby your way too!
2006-06-06 20:19:07 · answer #7 · answered by jeter's gal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do... because of NATO Bin Laden *& Saddam were allowed to go free when the USA troops under NATO's command(Gulf War).
We have been attcked on our shores...yet we go there and build schools,hospitals,clinics and roads for their countires...train their people to do for themselves....as in any society you have a few bad apples who ruin it for everyone..I am referring to the exteremists who believe allah wants ALL infidels killed....they even kill their own who don't agree with straping on a bomb and blowing people up.....they too are considered infidels....as the koran states in many places to honor allah they MUST rid the world of ALL infidels "keep your enemies close and kill them where you may,as this is true honor to allah"....
Clinton was a woosy..he was so stupid he sent bombers there and bombed them and fly home...Kinda like poking an angry hive of bees with a stick !!
The musliums declared a holy war in the late 70's.....most people are clueless about the REAL reason things are so violent over there & on our shores,in England,Africa(they just violently took over Semolia...AGAIN ) and any place infidels live.
2006-06-06 20:24:26 · answer #8 · answered by justnanous 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For what, starting a war on the worlds poor?
Jesus man, get some perspective, how can that racist capitalist be considered anything other then the scum he is? No wonder the worlds turing against you, hes the typical American idiot. Theirs so many other decent Americans, and you picked him..jesus...
2006-06-06 20:16:10 · answer #9 · answered by thomas p 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Nobel Prize for incompetence wasn't invented yet.
Face it , he is a killer !
2006-06-06 20:21:30 · answer #10 · answered by willow, the yodakitty from hell 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm really not sure. He will probably cripple the USA economically and militarily, which might usher in a more peaceful world, but how much damage will he do first?
2006-06-06 20:16:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋