Liberals, are you disappointed with your fellow libs?

Question

Liberals, are you disappointed with your fellow libs? Why can’t you answer any questions with facts? Why is it all you can do is make accusations with no merit?

You are unable to tell me how the democrats represent the poor people:
http://tinyurl.com/r6xl8

You are unable, or unwilling to answer my question about going into Africa:
http://tinyurl.com/f22du

You cannot tell me what the democrats would do to prevent terrorism (twice):
http://tinyurl.com/zcg79
http://tinyurl.com/fwked

You are quick to spew anything anti-bush, without researching things:
http://tinyurl.com/gjmdo

Don't I have to get answers before I can like an answer?

My point is that you liberals cannot, or will not answer straight forward questions.

g, tell me specifically what I said that you think is not true.

G, maybe you missed the concept. I was asking questions. The liberals were supposed to answer, but they could not. What are you babbling about? be specific please.

g, so when new republicans don't cite something, it leads to distrust, but when liberals dont cite something we should take it as gospel?

By the way, I did cite the dollar amount that Bush Increased to the 'Head Start' program.

Now, can you answer any of my questions with facts to back them up? I asked the questions, and I did not receive any answers because you socialist liberals don't want to make yourselves look like hypocrites.

I have been accused of lying, and erasing questions. I tried to email the two people, and their email either wont work, or they dont have it listed.

If you are going to accuse me of something, be specific, so I can defend myself.

1. I have never erased a question.

2. Please tell me one lie I have told!

Answer 1

Man, "Schmorgen" never gets it right.

Clinton was in charge of FEMA on July 13, 1995 when the great heat wave hit Chicago killing more than 700 mostly poor, black and elderly victims who perished as city and state medical officials complained they were overwhelmed by the greatest disaster to hit the U.S. in the last 112 years.

"On the first day of the heat wave, Thursday, July 13, the temperature hit 106 degrees, and the heat index — a combination of heat and humidity that measures the temperature a typical person would feel — rose above 120," reported Eric Klinenberg, author of "Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago."

With Chicago's poor, black and elderly dropping like flies, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported: "President Clinton seemed unperturbed, going for a mid-morning jog and then playing 18 holes of golf in a threesome that included Judge Richard Arnold of Little Rock."

Answer 2

you have bias questions that don't cite your stats and only go off of opinion.... I really don't believe a word you say, and you don't even know where you got your information...

I DIDN'T SEE YOU CITE ONE THING... YOU HAVE NO ACTUAL FACTS...

many actually listed answers to what you ask, but you ignore it...I clearly told you what we would do for terror and you only had excuses....

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Atov2FkbK6nepGmqqXOqs6Dsy6IX?qid=1006053127913

all you did was cry in this one about Pakistan... "oh destabilize the government"... of a dictator? kind of like you have in Iraq?

you cry and blame Clinton with things that you can't support... all you have is conservative opinion and blogs to back you up... no facts

EDIT:
I just want cites on your stats... that's all... shouldn't be too much to ask... I'm sure you don't have them memorized, you get them from somewhere...
not citing them is very suspicous... if you say something is fact, the burden of truth is on you if you ask me...

for one example: Your Bush spent more than Clinton on social programs statement... are those adjusted for inflation? Are they based on percentages or per student or just an overall number? These things make a huge difference and if you cite it, I can see it...
When you and your conservative brethern NEVER HARDLY EVER CITE ANYTHING... it leads to distrust...

Answer 3

How did Bush "prevent" a terror attack? The worst one in history happened on his watch! He's supposed to get a freakin' gold star because it hasn't happened again?

Democrats had FEMA running well with a director who had a clue. A lot of poor people died in the aftermath of Katrina.

I'm sorry if the truth is Anti-Bush. Turn off Faux news and open your eyes.

Answer 4

No. I'm disappointed in the corruption and greed that our country is based on. Both parties are responsible. I'm also disappointed in how we Americans cannot have a debate without insulting each other and how I feel the line between Libs and Cons reminds me of Union and Confederate.

Insult my answer all you want, but you asked my opinion so I gave it to you.

Answer 5

I think that maybe you are really a democrat.. All you do is make yourself and your supposed party look bad. Though I have noticed on some of your questions that really good questions happen to mysteriously disapear. I didn't know you could do that, maybe other conservatives are reporting the good answers...

Answer 6

If you don't like the answers, maybe you should stop asking the questions and get a good night's sleep. Stop obsessing about people who disagree with your view of the world. Believe me when I tell you that they're not going away.

Answer 7

I too am not a Liberal. Prepare yourself for some angry and ignorant answers. Remember. This is the land of the free and some of the answers will make you want to throw up. Try not to.

Answer 8

the respond is by the fact there is plenty confusion as to what those labels propose. Left and proper are thoroughly ineffective words with reference to politics, and that i propose that individuals quit utilising those words. while some human beings think of that stunning refers to Conservatives and others think of it refers to Nazis and fascists, the term's meaning is somewhat nebulous. So, if we won't agree on what it means, why use it? How will we communicate strategies if we don't have the comparable information of the words? at present, the Neo Cons have tried to assume the label "Conservative", and yet they have little or no in simple with Conservatives. actual Conservatives are in want of small, constrained government, Constitutional government. Conservatives do no longer recommend conflict different than as a final option, or maybe then, merely with a announcement of conflict by technique of the Congress. Conservatives don't think in Internationalism. We recommend national sovereignty, and strictly proscribing the capability and authority of the federal government to what the form authorizes. Conservatives have confidence in confusing money - gold and silver coin, no longer inflatable fiat money. Conservatives recommend own freedom - yet no longer license. we wish the minimum volume of government - basically adequate to guard our rights. and those rights prepare to ALL individuals, born or unborn. there is not any stunning to abortion, yet actually, abortion is a state subject, no longer federal. The proper court replaced into incorrect to rule on a state subject. The Neo Cons, for my area are nearer to the Nazis than to the Conservatives. The Neo Cons recommend Internationalism, "loose commerce" agreements with different countries, the UN, the IMF the international financial business enterprise and different sovereignty compromising communities. The Neo Cons sell waging undeclared conflict around the area for what they communicate over with as "our pursuits". The Neo Cons want to sacrifice our freedoms for the promise of secure practices for terrorism: the Patriot Act, the actual identity, the safeguard u . s . of america Act, the protection rigidity Commissions Act, the dept of place of beginning Terrorism and using torture. And the Neo Cons, like the Nazis use hatred: hatred against Muslims and Arabs, hatred against returning Iraqi veterans, hatred against people who're professional-existence of professional-gun. And yet, the Neo Cons call themselves "Conservatives"!

Answer 9

nicholasrage ... my brother from the front lines at Yahoo Message Boards! Glad to see you here!

I doubt that liberals are disappointed with their fellow libs because they're too full of compassion ... for the children.

Answer 10

good answer g.

this guy nicolasraage is full of b.s.

he lies when he says no one gives him answers.
lots of people give him answers.
the better your answer the more he ignores it.

he supports bush jr. no matter what.

he is not the only republican campaigner on this site.

he is a self appointed campaigner of course. he could never get a real job with the republicans.