What would the point of G Dumbya selling America ports to Arabs (OPEC) when they are gouging America already?

Question

http://www.filmstripinternational.com/

http://hurryupharry.bloghouse.net/archives/2005/04/26/monitoring_bush_i_wanna_hold_your_hand.php

Answer 1

Just as the video says!

Answer 2

Hate to burst your bubble but 75% of our ports are controlled by foreign groups. It was no different then any other port sale done over the last 25 years. It was not going to OPEC but to a investment group. It was only such big news because right now everyone in US is paranoid about the middle east.

Answer 3

Do you know how to read? You seem to be able to type, so I assume so. If you do, please do some reading on subjects before you make such moronic comments.

The ports were not for sale. The contract for the ports belonged to a foreign company already. that company sold out to another foreign company. then people raised a fuss because it was an Arab company.

Do you think they were going to change all the workers to Arabs, or do you think they were going to keep the same AMERICANS working the ports that were working them under a different countries company?

Get over your old b.s. liberal crap. My God, you people are ignorant.

Answer 4

they are issues that can basically be got here across after hundreds and hundreds of trials. and of course, strict limit needs to be in place. even however, with the aid of fact the muse of technology is often changing with the aid of new discoveries, we would desire to even have sympathy to the drug corporation to boot. they are no longer miracle makers, they only attempt to make earnings by ability of advertising something that they "think of" might help human beings. think of the international without antibiotics and different drugs, how a lot of human beings might would desire to die? If we agree that technology can be replaced, the drug corporation would possibly no longer have an excuse of increasing drugs costs with the aid of fact of regulation wholesome.additionally if we glance on the different section that has used the socialist gadget it has slowed down and did no longer stay as much as its Utopian promise. No gadget is optimal yet open and unfastened industry is the main suitable available.

Answer 5

Actually, the chinese own most of our ports. They were the ones trying to sell them. As a rule, Presidents of the United States are not realtors.

Next bit of propaganda?

Answer 6

real simple, junior. if the arabs invest 7 billion dollars into a port, they sure as hell aren't going to blow it up

Answer 7

because bush wants to ruin America