Thank You so much for that question. She seems to be pretty damn close to it. Here is this self-loathing bi*ch who claims that these 9/11 widows are using their plight to further their political agenda. However, on 9/13/01, she used the death of her friend and conservative political lawyer, Barbara Gordon, to promote her own agenda and book. Mrs. Gordon was killed in the Pentagon attack. Now, Ann Coulter is brutally criticizing those widows for doing the same. What hypocrisy!!!
What is even more appalling is the silence of the conservative side. Only 2 have spoken out against Ann Coulter: NY Gov. Pataki and Republican Congressman Peter King. The silence of the rest of the conservative's movement has been deafening. Even ex-mayor Guiliani's office has "no comment". Does the ultra-right wing of the conservative movement wish to have this sad, pathetic, self-loathing, spiteful, hateful, poor excuse of a human being to be their spokesperson?
As a side note, have you ever seen her in a debate? She is totally incapable of a civilized debate. If you present a differing opinion, she is quick to get nasty, hit "below the belt", and make it personal. It certainly makes for great press, but it also makes her look like the vile fool that she is.
Only a scumbag like her would say and do such things to promote her interests, but so much more importantly pad her pocketbook.
Our society needs to take Ann Coulter for what she is: a huge frigging joke!
.
2006-06-10 12:31:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I had no idea who she waas until about ten minutes ago when I read her name on this Q. I just looked the article up and I'm inclined to agree. A couple of points.
She accuses widows of claiming to be the only ones affected by the terrorism; Surely they, aside from the actual victims are the ones primarily affected?
Trying to accuse people of using a spouses death as a means to a political end, is about one of the most disgusting things I've ever heard. Besides, has the Bush administration not used their deaths for politics in a pretext to invade Afganistan, and to a lesser extent Iraq? Why is she not attacking that?
I agree with Dave's point. She sounds very much like a media chancer trying to make a name for herself. Remember the saying; no publicity is bad publicity.
2006-06-08 01:29:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
She may be an incarnation of satan. I read the article and she was getting pissed because the four women in question said it was Bush's fault that 9/11 wasn't prevented. Umm...duh!! She's basically what happens when conservatives lose their minds, and lose their sense of reason. She sounds pretty judgemental of liberals to me. I think the world wouldn't mourn too much if she were to spontaneously combust and burn out of existance. I know I wouldn't at least.
2006-06-07 14:17:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by kaloptic 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
OMG! Someone else knows!!!! Praise the LAWD! Actually, I think if she and Tucker Carlson had a child, he/she would be the true Anti-Christ.
Seriously, she's not Satan. I think she only believes half of the filth that pours from her mouth, but she gets off on controversy, and the marketing opportunities it presents. But I wish her fifteen minutes would end already, even if her fame is limited to people who pay attention to what's going on.
2006-06-07 03:11:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dave 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, she is not Satan. She is just an outspoken conservative. She has the right to her opinion, even though most do not agree with her.
2006-06-06 16:27:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by ginaforu5448 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um... It was about the widows that clamor for media attention. Keep things in perspective there kiddo.
2006-06-06 16:19:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In historical Jewish custom devil is merely an angel doing the artwork that God assigned to devil to do. The be conscious devil means challenger. With the belief of devil difficult us, or tempting in case you will. This description sees devil because of the fact the angel who's the embodiment of guy's stressful circumstances. this concept of devil works heavily with God as an quintessential area of Gods plan for us. His interest is to make figuring out on stable over evil adequate of a project so as that it is going to become clean to us that there could be merely one significant or logical determination. assessment this to Christianity, which sees devil as God's opponent. In Jewish concept, the thought there exists something able to placing itself up as God's opponent would be seen polytheistic or installation the devil to be an the two useful polarity to god or a demigod. Oddly, data for The Christian devil/devil mythology is supposedly got here upon interior the classic Jewish texts that have been borrowed to create the bible. you will’t help yet ask your self how Christians got here up with the style of tremendously diverse interpretation of Gods assistant devil of their theology. different tricks approximately devil’s function in human kin could be seen in case you seem on the call Lucifer. It meaning interior the unique tongue interprets as mild bearer or mild bringer. actually the bringer of enlightenment. the enticements of the devil concept convey absolutely everyone at last into Gods mild. no longer often the Evil entity of Christian mythology. Love and advantages don
2016-11-14 07:32:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You and I disagree on a couple things. Does that make me Satan?
2006-06-06 17:29:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by comfort eagle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think she is the equivilent of a shock dj, all this publicity is just helping sell her book.
2006-06-08 03:54:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tom H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you know, i saw her on "today" with matt lauer this morning, yelling and shouting, accusing him of being snippy... when the VERY same thought occured to me!
i bet ol' scratch simply filed off his horns, tucked in his tail, got a bad dye job and voila!
i'm glad i'm not the only one...
THANKS!
2006-06-06 16:21:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋