payoffs kickbacks and hush money
2006-06-06 15:20:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by johnman142 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the two the Dem's' and re pubs' can not often agree on something even whilst they choose an identical situation. till you circulate to c-span you will no longer see plenty coverage of one/3 occasion applicants. super firms make extensive contributions to applicants they help,you're constrained in how plenty you are able to donate to a candidate individually. firms set up committees and communities to help and fund applicants. the latest financial disaster regulations have been written by utilising the banking marketplace for congress to make into regulation and it bit them in the butt. the different situation is that some human beings vote for one million occasion continuously,the two because of the fact they help that occasion continuously and have faith it particularly is the only occasion to do whats suitable,or they are upset with the different occasion for some reason. the two events choose it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I examine on the information superhighway final evening is even 0.5 authentic,this election won't count besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/11 or a significant catastrophe earlier the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush will replace into the authentic technique of government. If it happens after the elections and earlier the hot president takes place of work,i don't be attentive to what's going to take place. G.W. signed an government order for the continuity of government and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the form and the President may be the cohesion government. Congress and the proper court docket will nonetheless exist yet might have little or no voice,the President has the purely suitable say in all concerns. there became additionally yet another website speaking relating to the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. shape would be long previous.
2016-12-08 17:56:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know this.
1) The person with the best lawyer wins.
2) You're guilty until proven guilty.
3) Don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
2006-06-06 15:21:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The right Trial by Jury of your peers
The burden of proof is on the prosecution (Innocent until proven guilty)
Legal Precendent and Judicial Review
2006-06-06 16:20:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Quixotic Cowboy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Innocent until proven guilty
Precedent (that whole thing where they look to what courts have decided before instead of the whatever the judge wants)
The appeals process
2006-06-06 15:26:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by text avitar 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Damn you John.
I was gonna say Corporate Interest, Christian policies, and who could forget lobbyists,
2006-06-06 15:21:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by someDumbAmerican 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Money, money and money.
2006-06-06 15:21:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by iansand 7
·
0⤊
0⤋