Michael Jackson?

Question

Why do people think that he's a child molester? I mean, do they have facts?

But there's witnesses, so I'm not sure.

But still, he's acquitted.

But he might be guilty.

Your mom's guilty.

Chuck Norris.

Answer 1

Regardless of how we feel about it, Michael Jackson is innocent. Flip the script. (The following example is hypothetical, please don't take it seriously... it's just that... an example.)

For example, you're at school and James has a pen and is using the pen. When James isn't looking, the pen falls on the ground. James looks back, and the pen is gone. James says that you took the pen. James looks behind him and asks Laurie did you take the pen. Laurie says yes because she doesn't like you. But the pen fell on the floor!!

This was just an example, but use it in Michael Jackson's scenario. The facts of the most recent case.

-Gavin spent several months at Neverland with Michael, his sister, his brother, and his own mother!
-They did spend in the night in Michael's room (as most of the kids that stayed at Neverland)
- There is NO proof that Michael gave alcohol to the minors (no eye-witnesses). The witnesses that they had in the case were not creditable.
- There is NO proof that Michael molested that child. Remember the DNA evidence they took in December, 2004? Remember the matching fingerprints on the magazines? Remember the internet cache of the porn sites? NONE of this was creditable and linked Michael Jackson either molesting this child or doing anything improper with this child.

SO HOW can you convict a person based on the evidence at hand. Use the example of James and the pen. He accused you of doing something improper without having the necessary evidence to prosecute!

Making an argument that he is guilty because he is weird, strange, and what 47 year-old-man likes to play with children other than a pedophile. Michael Jackson, by the evidence, is neither a pedophile nor homosexual. Please people, look at the evidence before you convict someone of anything improper.

Below is a hyperlink to the detailed facts of the case: Michael Jackson v. People of California

Answer 2

No they just have gold diggers trying to get his money!! The last mother had tried to sue people before. I feel bad for the kids cause their mothers made them lie!

We Love You Michael!!!!

Answer 3

I don't think he is a child molester.He turned out innocent in the court.

Answer 4

People need money and that's how they can get it, by acusing Mike that he molested their children.

Answer 5

I don;t think so, he just loves kids thats all, and people are trying to get some money from him

Answer 6

Guilty. Why else would he be living in another country now? Even before he moved, though I believed him to be guilty. OJ too.

Answer 7

Of course he's guilty. He just got away with it and only had to pay a fine. I hate him. >(

Answer 8

I believe they do have facts...he is a celebrity...they get away with things