2006-06-06 14:17:25 · 33 answers · asked by MAng Tanong 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I know he surpass the trial for being innocent on the child molestation charges, how about you what is your judgement? Does being king of the pop he should be free of charges?
2006-06-06 14:23:01 · update #1
INNOCENT!! Being the KING OF POP does not mean he shouldn't face charges but when the Mom is totally discredited because she has a habit of suing people for money that's when the charges lose credibility! I personally don't think someone with the mind of a child would molest a child! Maybe he would rather hang out with kids cause they are less judgemental and don't listen to all the media like most adults do!
We Love You Michael!!!!
2006-06-07 02:36:27 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that is his not guilty.
This is for two reasons.
The first is that it's just my opinion. I have read of his past and feel that he is a child at heart. He hangs around with children, he does childish things, and he lives in his own fantasy world.
This is weird to most people because they don't do it, and so many people believe that if it's not done by the majority, it's weird or wrong. But being weird, at least according to the law, is not a crime.
The second reason that he is not guilty is that he went through our court system and he was not found to be guilty.
Accept this, because if there was strong proof that he was a child molester, there is no amount of money that would have caused a jury or a judge to let him go. He would be in prison right now.
My 2 cents and my answer.
Love, as always,
Sebastian
2006-06-16 22:09:06 · answer #2 · answered by octo_boi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty
2006-06-16 21:42:51 · answer #3 · answered by Temptation 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guilty
2006-06-06 14:19:56 · answer #4 · answered by Jonay 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I seriously don't think he's a child molester or a threat to children, but I do think the man has mental issues and oversteps boundries with the children. Loves them too much type of thing. Now-a-days people can sue you for HUGGING their child and MJ allowed them to sleep in his bed. In the minds of the childrens parents, that was enough to get to the mans bank account.
I feel sorry for Michael.
2006-06-18 10:56:49 · answer #5 · answered by sahm2boys 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Michael Jackson is not guilty, he love children and he love to hang around with them, they have try this several times before and it didn't work, he is not that stupid to try that he is a well know guy, and he have money, no no,if you listen to the charges you see what I mean, the whole case pure stipulation, I think it is time people leave him alone with his money and let him enjoy it,
2006-06-15 07:24:22 · answer #6 · answered by boy_jam_arch 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guilty!
2006-06-18 05:21:20 · answer #7 · answered by Tim F 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I look to McCauley Caulkin, he spent so much time with him and he said on "Larry King" that he never did anything to him at all. I do believe he is a childlike man, but that is because he was expected to be an adult when he was a child. I think he does sleep with kids but I dont think he has done anything with them, maybe I just want to believe it but as I said not only McCauley Caulkin but another actor (whose name I cant recall) spent lots of time there and he too said that he never did anything (even though he has other issues with MJ).
2006-06-15 07:55:28 · answer #8 · answered by Jan G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is definitly a guilty MO FO that shoud not be allowed to be near children at all even and especially his own.
2006-06-18 03:34:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not Guilty.
2006-06-10 22:36:13 · answer #10 · answered by Jackson 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋