English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean, come on, the 10 Most Wanted are right here in the United States and it's nearly impossible to find any of those people. Why can't liberals understand that it might just be a smidge difficult to find Osama when he's hiding some cave in some mountain range in some country in the middle of nowhere?

Think about how hard it is to find you car keys some times and then listen as some liberals whine that Bush has failed because Osama hasn't been caught.



(I totally stole this question from someone else. I just liked it so much I had to give it another go.)

2006-06-06 13:24:24 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

The reason somebody like Osama Bin Laden hasn't been caught is because he has plenty of supporters and followers in the Mid-East is because they think he is terrific along with their fanatical cause. It has nothing to do with being liberal or conservative.

2006-06-06 13:32:20 · answer #1 · answered by Captain X 3 · 0 0

no one says it's easy to find osama. at least most people know he's in afghanistan and not in iraq!! not when an idiot keep pumping billions and billions of dollars that belong to regular tax payers into a war for personal gain, and not when poor families' sons and daughters of Americans ' bodies keep piling up as there is no end to the war. just like after the hurricane in New Orleans what is the incentive to help the poor people there? Not unless there are barrels and barrels of oil buried underneath. You want to talk about being Unamerican! Look no further than people who run this country!! A sham and a damn shame!! A rich Arab oil man is worth more than thousands of real Americans! Wake up people!!

2006-06-06 13:38:08 · answer #2 · answered by sstooc2001 6 · 0 0

Wait a sec. You advise if Congress provides the administrative great ability to look into on human beings, it will use it? Benghazi is a witch hunt being devised from a tragedy. it particularly is Republicans searching for political hazard. The AP surveillance is one hundred% legal with the aid of fact congress handed a regulation asserting it particularly is below our final president. The IRS concern, is a localized adventure in Cincinnati, which occurred and became got here across final twelve months. The operative became released. The president had no longer something to do with any of this. i discover the AP tale hectic, even yet it particularly is totally legal. i discover the IRS concern troubling, even yet it became dealt with a methods far off from presidential notice. relax. i'm useful you will discover yet another bright merchandise to distract you quickly.

2016-10-30 08:16:30 · answer #3 · answered by belschner 4 · 0 0

you lied again, seems that's what your best at.
"Since Liberals think it's so easy to find Osama,..."

Liberals don't think that. You just made it up because that's all you have.

Your not getting as much support as you used to.

Jamesmom, jmeege, and g - Good Answers !
but don't expect yahoo boy to give you credit for them.

bush jr. Failed because he sent most of our troops to the wrong country !
Osama is in Afghanistan, not Iraq.

2006-06-07 04:06:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

... have the others on the FBI's 10 most wanted killed 3,000?

I understand it's very difficult when you're not trying to find him... look at how many went after Saddam vs. how many went after Osama.... 100,000 after Saddam and 20,000 after Osama... we found Saddam, didn't find Osama... see a connection... when we try, we find people... I know you don't think the US army is capable... but I know it is...

Osama is responsible for 3,000 deaths on US soil... he admitted it...
Saddam is responsible for 0 deaths on US soil... that anyone can prove...

Why don't you Republicans care about Osama? You hide behind excuses like this?

2006-06-06 13:41:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It`s like a to do list...we all have them. They have`nt crossed off Saddam yet and they have other lists coming up like the future Iran list before they even get to Osama...and if they get him to trial they will have to find someone else to take his place,so they will have an excuse to keep pouring our tax dollars into the terrorism campaign.I think he will be around for a while longer.....

2006-06-06 13:38:10 · answer #6 · answered by aminuts 4 · 0 0

The answer is because they are only interested in bashing President Bush. If he was personally responsible for World Peace they would still bash him for something else. It seems to me liberals can always find fault in everyone else.

2006-06-06 13:30:21 · answer #7 · answered by Joe 1 · 0 0

Here's a recycled answer (my own) to your recyled question:

Who says we don't know EXACTLY where Osama Bin Laden is? Since Bin Laden has given his protectors orders to shoot him dead if any attempt is made to capture him, maybe we're waiting for an opportunity to capture him ALIVE.

We can't get information out of a dead man?

2006-06-06 14:01:13 · answer #8 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0 0

NEWS ALERT- conservatives led by George W. Bush said they would get bin Laden 6 years ago, DEAD or ALIVE, bring um on, stop your whining, why can't conservatives understand, you have had US troops in Afghanistan looking for a 7 ft. tall Islam for as many years as Clinton had to find him, when it was supposed to be SO EASY, my car keys are in my purse you moron

2006-06-06 13:55:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have never heard anyone say it is easy to find OBL. However, we would have stood a better chance of finding, or killing, OBL in Tora Bora, where he was hiding when our troops invaded Afghanistan, IF we had sent our own US special forces in to find him. Instead, we sent Afghanis. This decision has been called one of the biggest failures in the war on terror.

2006-06-06 13:29:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers