Candidate, yes, but she could never win, the conservative red states would never accept a female president.
2006-06-19 09:58:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by naomi 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think Mrs Clinton has made a very excellent Senator and would make an intelligent and capable President. She is well informed and has already spent 8 yrs as First Lady which gives her a unique perspective into foreign policy and domestic needs. However, because she is a woman, it will be difficult for her to run and as a Liberal ( oh my g-d I actually said that word) Democrat the right will crucify her. Would I like to see her run? Absolutely!! Do I think she should? No, The vilification she would endure is not worth it.
2006-06-16 11:56:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by olderandwiser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would actually love to see a women president because they can get the job done the right way. However, I don't think Hillary is the answer. She doesn't have the charisma her husband has. I would rather see a guy like Joe Biden become our president. He has experience, speaks well, looks at all views before making a judgement (unlike our current moron).
2006-06-17 19:43:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by TheMagicWand 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes she is a viable candidate. She can speak intelligently to the people, unlike Mr. Bush.
She will listen to the people and Congress and make smart decisions and get us out of the hole we are in with the deficit. Something her husband did after Bush Sr left office. She is the right choice.
2006-06-14 12:03:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by mavisbillt 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, she certainly has the will and the mind to run. But what she is lacking is certain intangiables such as charm and grace, the ability to go into a room and be persuasive like her hubby does. I do not believe she will ever be president. I believe that the Dems will choose somebody like Kerry again, as the left wing of the party will assert itself as the strongest of the factions. They want someone who is able to raise money, be dovish on the military, and have a plan for socialization.
2006-06-15 20:01:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Modest intellect 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
She couldn't even keep up on things in her own house and you wonder if she is viable? Can't even run her own family and we should consider her to run the country? I think not, Maybe John Mc Cain or anyone else but her! I'm all for a woman president but lets wait for the right one.
2006-06-06 12:11:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by housewrkrm 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, as I believe we messed up by accepting one person for president. If we're ever going to have a chance at fair and legal situation's, no one person has the mentality or that much knowledge, and shouldn't have that kind of power over us. I feel there should be four-2 men and 2 women, that must agree 100% on everything. There's just to much free reigns,lots of power and easy money for anyone person to handle and stay honest by theirself.
2006-06-16 18:52:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by booboo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No frigging way. She is too liberal, she has no common sense, no personality, and we really don't need the White House re-occupied by the sticky fingered white trash Clinton family.
Who, then? Colin Powell, John McCain, Condi Rice... any of them would do.
2006-06-06 12:10:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by meathead76 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
She's a liberal and has a Socialist agenda but a lot of liberals out there would love the USA to become Socialist. Isn't it obvious and isn't it dangerous to be under government control? Think about who you vote for people or you will get what you asked for.
2006-06-18 16:28:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Viable- yes, Capable- yes, Likely- yes............ But......
She is falling into the same trap that McCain is, trying to keep both sides of the fence. On one day she is so presidential that you say "hey, why not her" Then she pulls off a stupid stunt that sounds like she supports Bush and the BUsh-aholics
2006-06-15 11:41:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kwan fan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋