None whatsoever.
2006-06-06 10:39:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Black Fedora 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush is just a terrible president at the moment. He does share a comparison with many world leaders who have duped otherwise intelligent people into believing him through pure fear and propaganda. Only history can judge how much damage he has/will do. Check this out:
"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism...oh my, sounds familiar.
2006-06-06 11:49:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Amy L 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not Hitler was a mad man who attempted to create a superior race and ordered the death of over six million people. And he did it in some of the most despicable ways.He also had some of the most vicious people in his power. He was full of hate and used that hate to spread death and destruction to all those who would appose him. He was a horrible horrible man. Anyone who would build camps like Auschwitz and Sobibore extermination camps will have a special place in h---.To this day survivors of the Holocaust well forever have that nightmare in their minds. It was truly one of the darkest times in history, Although Bush's ideas may not be popular they are never the less what he thinks is best for America.
2006-06-06 10:56:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by bullticky 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have this really good book, cant remember what its called right now but it's written by two reputable authors who really know their stuff in political science and they compare not just bush but american tactics to hitler and the nazi's and how they use similar means to get things done. It's not a blast on america for all you rediculously sensitive patriots out there. I'll post it once I get the title.
2006-06-06 10:41:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by audio_uphoria 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not, only an uneducated individual or naive child would even make the comparison. It's okay not to like someone, or to disagree with their philosophy, but this is trash. Do you get this garbage on line? If so, you might want to expand your horizons, not everything you find on the Internet is true.
2006-06-06 10:52:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
how could you say that i see a very BIG difference bush at last keeps those stupid invaders in there own place and hitler didnt so you need to be quiet bout him
2006-06-06 10:40:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Miranda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler became a socialist dictator. Stalin became a communist dictator. Hitler blamed the Communist and between different team of human beings such with the aid of fact the Jews for the excellent melancholy. Hitler and Stalin have been the two leaders of their very own international locations of WW2. Hitler became in charge for 18 thousands and thousands lives and Stalin became in charge for OVER 40 thousands and thousands lives or extra with the aid of fact the perfect factors have been in no way tracked and in no way given away, that is all predication and assumption. In my very own opinion, i do no longer think of particularly do no longer think of there became a worse one. Stalin despatched human beings to Serbia rather of killing them and Hitler despatched many Jews to concentration camps and killed them. the two have been dictators who needed to combat for his or her very own u . s . a . and satisfaction.
2016-10-30 08:07:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by sikorski 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but Hitler was a hateful little man like you.
2006-06-06 11:42:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by RockHunter 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
only if you could see the same similarities between clinton and hitler
2006-06-06 10:39:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by mister_number_one 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
I'm no fan of President Bush but there is no comparison.
Bush is a dope...Hitler was just plain evil.
2006-06-06 10:39:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by docscholl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both have dellusions of grandeur, but Hitler was actually smart and charismatic. Chimp only fools himself.
2006-06-06 10:39:36
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋