I think he is close to the best. I might think Roy Orbison, and Nat King Cole they were great.
2006-06-06 09:49:08 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
But no one will EVER take Freddies place.
2006-06-06 10:00:14 · update #1
do you have an obsession?
2006-06-06 10:13:17 · answer #1 · answered by countrygirlcansurvive 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think Freddie is! it is based on his range as a singer. Roy Orbison and Nat King Cole are good, but I don't feel they are as versatile.
2006-06-06 16:58:25 · answer #2 · answered by Vinyleyes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hes not the best but he definatly had a range thats hard to match. Many artists around today cannot compare at all and one would be hard pressed to find one that could sing even a few of his songs in the same styling he did. Although I heard the singer who is currently touring with Queen is doing a great job, although he is singing the songs differently than Freddie.
2006-06-06 16:58:13 · answer #3 · answered by tinks44 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do believe Freddie had one of the best male vocals of all time but more than that he was a musical genius. How he came up with such creations are "Bohemian Rhapsody," "Somebody to love," or even one of his last collaborations with Queen: "Innuendo" is beyond me. What a talent and a loss to the music industry.
2006-06-07 16:15:33 · answer #4 · answered by whattawow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like Orbison better. Maybe Marty Robbins, best.
2006-06-06 16:55:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freddie is one of the best i have had the pleasure of seeing live in concert twice, and one of the best voices and entertainers i have ever seen.
2006-06-08 00:24:24 · answer #6 · answered by queen4ever 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋