were explosives used in 9/11 ? watch this ok?

Question

larry silverstein admited on the news that he "pulled" building 7 of the world trade center which he admitted they he demolished it http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3858617066028236099&q=conspiracy+9%2F11 watch this please!

Answer 1

No, in the building 7 no was explosives, here is the real fact,when the wonder woman see all the problem take the invisible air plane an go to save the twin towers, but a crazy terrorist take the controls and hit the building 7

Answer 2

the cloud of dust coming from the windows DURING the collapse? you have a huge amount of steel and concrete coming down, the air inside had to go somewhere. a rock being dropped from the 94th floor fell in the same amount of time as the tower to fall? steel is more dense and heavier, so it will fall faster. the fire not being big enough? it wasn't the fire, it was the supporting walls that were destroyed when the airplanes crashed. it should have taken longer to fall because when it hit the floor, it should had taken time to break through? you have tons of stuff falling, the floor might have slowed down the fall at first, but has it got closer to the bottom, and as more stuff has falling faster, it wouldn't have made a dent. if there was explosives, why crash the planes? you could have just used the explosives and be done with that, terrorists use those too. i think i covered it all.

Answer 3

I have watched it over and over again before. It does look like a controlled demolition. But it also could be the fact that the towering floors above were literally melted. Since the floors were panacked together, it could have been when it was falling to the ground created air pockets that looked like mini explosives. But if you are interested in 9/11 conspircy theroies type it in on wikipedia and more theories will come about

Answer 4

There is proof on both sides of the coin and it can all be disputed. Engineers have stated that the building was not hot enough to melt (black smoke is the first sign of a cool fire), but others say metal would have become 50% weaker. It depends on who you believe.

I am curious personally on the building falling on top of itself. Experts have said its hard enough to plan a demolition to be that perfect, let alone have it happen with planes.

Also, only using explosives defeats the whole purpose of the the hijacked planes.

Answer 5

There was a great article on the front page of the June 5th New York Times about the convention in Chicago with all of these conspiracy theorists. As a World Trade Center victim myself, I find all of these conspiracy theories very tiresome & products of fertile, but understimulated minds.

Answer 6

Of course they did. REPUBLICANS AND BUSH ARE CORRUPT. THEY PLANNED 9-11. WHY WTC 7? BECAUSE THAT BUILDING HAD ARCHIVES OF INFORMATION THE GOVERNMENT DIDN'T WANT TO BE RELEASED. THE PEOPLE NEED TO REVIEW OUR GOVERNMENT. WE CAN'T ACCEPT THIS AT ALL.

Answer 7

Old news.

Answer 8

Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit ,, just like they never went to the Moon, Diana was killed by the MI6 just a load of crap,,

Answer 9

THERE WAS ENOUGH FUEL IN THE AIRPLANES TO BLOW UP THE WHOLE BUILDING.