What would be allowed and not allowed and who gets to make that distinction?
2006-06-06 05:04:47 · 8 answers · asked by lunatic 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Probably Mars..desolate and barren..
2006-06-07 02:20:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would look like something out of a George Orwell novel.
Let's face it, World Peace is a noble goal but one filled with danger. We would have overpopulation. We would have rules & regulations beyond anything we can imagine or tolerate today. And what would we do with lawbreakers in a "peaceful" society as surely jailing or executing them would not be in keeping with our peaceful intents.
2006-06-06 05:07:48 · answer #2 · answered by kja63 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's the heart of the matter...everyone wants to be boss! The fact is peace is about us all living in love without someone telling us how and what is acceptable.
2006-06-06 05:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by jmmevolve 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very nice.
And the only way to do it would be a global government, controlled by a global assembly based on the principles of representative democracy.
2006-06-06 05:08:44 · answer #4 · answered by Sean F 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
first, world piece. muslims would be a fading memory. we would not need oil for anything. the middle east would have no hold on the rest of the world. all nations would have the same freedoms for all there people. disagreements would be solved by talk, not fighting and killing each other. free health care for all.
2006-06-06 05:10:53 · answer #5 · answered by maria_cd_in_training 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lovely
2006-06-06 05:26:33 · answer #6 · answered by let me guess 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you, your dissition is always yours.
2006-06-06 05:15:39 · answer #7 · answered by luloy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whiter...
2006-06-06 05:07:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋