2006-06-06 03:32:59 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
There are so many levels to this question. Spiritual poverty? A lack of faith? Therefore a lack of caring for others? Mental poverty? Lack of schooling or education. Lacking reasoning or critical thinking skills? Emotional poverty? being too much in the head and not balancing it with heart. A lack of mercy in dealing with law? Physical poverty? Lack of physical requirements for the body's survival? Financial poverty? lack of money (a unit of exchange)?
No, at least not in my lifetime.
Governmental leaders need to be honest and fair and those requirements are being subjective. The powerful nations constantly send out aid to many countries (even if it is used as bribery on the political level). The countries receiving aid have in most cases a corrupt government that just simply pockets the contributions, or severely limits who can do what, where.
So, thinking holistically, the entire global community needs to change. It is possible, but not at this time.
2006-06-18 04:40:13 · answer #1 · answered by Ding-Ding 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
As for the communism - no ******* way, doesn't work, been proved. I recommend Atlas Shrugged to Candi, it's a huge book but definitely worth getting through. The things communism does to people! Not a way, ever.. !!
When everybody feels a much greater responsibility for the state of the planet, that would be the beginning of the end of poverty. However, I don't see that coming any time soon, some of us still aren't able to even recycle properly, we are just too short-sighted..
2006-06-19 00:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by Wandering Cat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Honestly, I believe that if the First world nations do not change there will be more extreme poverty
2006-06-14 12:13:34 · answer #3 · answered by pelancha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a collaborative effort between richer nations and governments.
Whether or not we find a solution to this problem... is anyone's guess.
In countries where there's overpopulation like Indonesia, China & India, land is getting scarce and most families have more than 3 kids with barely enough wage to get through their lives.
It also boils down to making education compulsory & available at an affordable rate for these impoverished families.
2006-06-16 16:45:06 · answer #4 · answered by ViRg() 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ending severe poverty might tip the scales, and a number of of alternative the quite wealthy human beings could be fairly indignant. An occasion of this could be an previous flesh presser named "Huey long". He became the former governor of Louisiana for the time of the FDR administration. He began out as an FDR supporter, yet later grew to become his opposition. Huey long became hated by ability of many with the aid of fact he believed that every person would desire to have a share of the yank dream. wealthy human beings hated him with the keenness. in certainty, he became hated lots, that he became later shot and killed! Google Huey long, or look in Wikipedia, and you will see what i'm speaking approximately! the guy became a special flesh presser. between the very few who cared a great deal approximately destructive human beings.
2016-10-30 07:36:06 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do chickens have teeth?
Is the Pope Protestant?
Does the Sun rise in the West?
When all three of the above happen simultaneously, that is when poverty will end.
2006-06-17 01:59:51 · answer #6 · answered by Gray Matter 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In the biblical sense yes. Meaning that after all events have taken place in scripture the Just will reign with Christ in the new heaven and on the earth. There will be no poverty then.
However(Jesus said) it is written:
Matthew 26:11
The poor you will always have with you, but you will not always have me.
So...no not in this life.
2006-06-14 19:32:06 · answer #7 · answered by blakelycollierbrown 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are two answers to this:
1) Yes, if the human race wakes up eventually, stops wasting money on wars, luxuries, religions and space exploration and begins to care for the future of their own and of this planet.
2) No, if things stay as they are now.
2006-06-06 03:38:40 · answer #8 · answered by Sean F 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How long has this been part of the world? If there can be an end to it, it would have happened already!
My answer quite frankly, NO! it will always be part of life, and for different reasons.
2006-06-18 10:49:02 · answer #9 · answered by penhabsa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because there will be extra money given to other countries who are worse off then we are as long as Bush is in office. And we have to put an end to all the wasteless spending going on in politics
2006-06-18 11:23:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋