There's more out there, guys... I'm thinking Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi--It's not like we don't have a back bench! I think the Republicans just want another good round of Hillary bashing for no reason, so they keep treating her as a candidate...
2006-06-05 22:21:27 · 5 answers · asked by smurfette 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
To add to your list
Russ Feingold, Mark Warner and for VP Obama
2006-06-05 22:45:12 · answer #1 · answered by Mike 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nancy Pelosi? Now there's a candidate I'd like to see run for president, my kitten could beat her in an election! I am a republican and don't worry about bashing Hillary Clinton, she has enough personal baggage to weigh her down. I don't think the democrats are bright enough to give Barack Obama the nod, so I think you'll see Edwards, Kerry and Lord help us all, Gore the bore. Let's face it, so far the terrible trio are the ones that are out there and look like they will run.
2006-06-06 05:30:14 · answer #2 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Also Republican... and, why do you guys keep making the same mistakes? Why would you nominate a Washington insider divisive entrenched liberal? We can put literally this guy's moderate republican cat up there & walk away with it. We haven't been rigging elections last couple times, you guys just keep handing it to us.
Bidden could give us a run, but his Iraq ideas are beyond insane. Declare defeat, split the thing up so regional wars start all over the mid-east, & walk away cause were scared? Who's gonna vote for that? I got friends killed over there & I'll call the guy a flat straight up coward, how long you think before that sticks. Can you not find a moderate outsider that can reach outside the major urban areas. Have you looked at a county-by-county map of the last two elections? You guys are in more trouble then you think.
Still our party is jacked. We'll keep congress, but they better turn it around & start acting republican, and the President needs to take advantage of som eopportunities & get his numbers back around even. Plus right now our base is pissed & that'll drive us right for a while. We got about 18 months to work out our issues and get back to a moderate candidate or we're leaving it wide open for you to take. Meanwhile every one of our candidates are more liberal then Bush & he's too liberal for the party.
2006-06-06 06:20:28 · answer #3 · answered by djack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We had the perfect candidate in 2004 and this stupid country refused to wake up. Wesley Clark had all the right stuff. He wasn't a D.C. insider, he was a recently retired General who had the experience and brains to handle the mess that Bushco created in Iraq and he was very intellegent unlike the Monkey we have in there now. Clark would have been the answer this country needed. Whether or not he runs during the next Presidential election I don't know but I do know that anyone who really would care and do their best for this country and isn't a Washington pawn doesn't stand a chance in hell because it is estimated that to run for President in 2008 a candidate would need about 200 million dollars to do so.
2006-06-06 07:32:45 · answer #4 · answered by houseswife 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know that Joseph Biden has declared that he is running in '08.
2006-06-06 05:25:21 · answer #5 · answered by Aemilia753 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋