Gay marraige? Gay parade during primetime with children watching? How do you feel about being labeled a bigot if you disagree with them? How do you feel about once good symbols such as the rainbow and even the word "gay" being taken over by the homosexual community?
2006-06-05
21:23:10
·
16 answers
·
asked by
jack f
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Cultures & Groups
➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Dont personalize this please. I am only asking a question. Thanks.
2006-06-05
21:30:27 ·
update #1
I am not satisfied with these answers and think many of those that responded are gay. To get a different take on this I will ask the same or simular question in a different topic heading area. Thank you anyways for responding.
2006-06-06
10:28:50 ·
update #2
Yes, absolutely. Even though whenever people have the chance, they affirm their support for traditional marriage, the homosexuals are pushing their agenda in the courts, trying to get judges to create a "right" to gay marriage by fiat.
Another way I think that liberals advance the homosexual agenda is through their many flattering portrayals of homosexuals in the media. Hollywood is trying to brainwash us to accept the idea of homosexuality.
The militant homosexuals want us to believe that homosexuality is an inborn trait, and want us to pretend that ex-gays don't exist. Because the existence of ex-gays proves the fact that homosexuality is a choice that homosexuals can overcome through therapy. There's even an association of mental health professionals who help homosexuals who want to change their sexuality.
2006-06-05 21:30:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
As a lesbian I personally have no agenda...I just hear all the heterosexual people talk about "the agenda"!
For me personally same sex marriage is not the church kind, but rather the legal kind. Like when heterosexual people get married at home affairs. This union will only allow for the same legal rights, such as being able to see your life partner in ICU for instance.
If you think about it: Why are straight people so intimidated by gay people if we only make up such a small percentage of the earth's population?
If you posed this question 20 - 30 years ago, would it have read:
Is the African American agenda or the Jewish agenda being forced down our throats?
2006-06-05 22:41:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gays don't have an agenda. *rolls eyes*
I think gays should be alowed to marry.
I see nothing wrong with gay parades.
I don't think people are a bigots JUST for disagreeing, people are intitled to there opention... being open minded and understanding isn't agreeing with some one it's understanding them and tolorating the fact they have an opention/belife that's diffrent than you. If there JUST disagreeing then it's rather bigoty to call them a bigot for it..... people are intitled to disagree with gays as much as anyone else.
Well gay is what heterosexals have called them. And I'm not all that bothered by them liking rainbows anyway..... there pritty in the sky and all but I think there uggly when you try and wair them.
They aren't trying to make people be gay... the only thing the ones out 'fighting' for anything is a little understanding and compation. They don't whant there rights taken away, and I can't blame them. If some gay person came along and tried to make it so I couldn't marry my sweet little puppy-girl I would get pissed and i'm sure there would be more than just a buch of peacefull prottests out there then.
(oh and skimming through the old questions...... there more ex-hetersexuals than ex-homosexuals..... dose than mean I need therapy to make me gay? I really hope not. lol =p )
2006-06-05 21:39:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by CrazyCat 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well... homosexuals didn't "take over" the word gay... it was a label put on them by straight people.
And just as people are now striving for equal rights and the chance for children to grow up not hating people they don't understand... There are the extreme rights who want to deny these people their right to be happy.
No one is forcing anything down your throat. You're just breathing too hard as you try to spoon it into your own mouth. Its called change. Homosexuals don't choose to be the way they are. They're born that way. Sure, it may be different than you'd think logic and nature would have intended.... but the world isn't perfect... we just strive to make it fair.
2006-06-05 21:28:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by mattorodinku 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, look at billboards. There, you are more likely to see expressions of heterosexuality.
Look at most other advertising. There, you are more likely to see expressions of heterosexuality.
Look at television shows and movies. There, you are more likely to see expressions of heterosexuality (even in King Kong).
Look at people at the mall, in the park, school dances, proms, and all sorts of social arenas. There, you are more likely to see expressions of heterosexuality.
I ask you this. What is being "forced" down anyone's throat.
I would say that heterosexuality has been forced down everyone's throats for way too long.
Now, we live in a time when Gays and Lesbeans are much more "out and about" than they could ever hope to be. Why couldn't they be so "out" before? Well, my answer is that the "heterosexual" agenda was forced down many throats and many Gays and Lesbeans were killed and kept silent for soooo long.
2006-06-05 21:42:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by My Big Bear Ron 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Gay as in "gay person" was instigated by the straight community created to make gay people appear different from everyone else. and if its being forced down your throat make sure you dont swallow or you might gag.Rainbow mean all races and creeds together because the gay community is more tolerant of others than the straight community. ok and Im straight.
2006-06-05 22:11:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
First, single and married are not sexual orientations. 2d, there is not any style of schedule to rigidity absolutely everyone to "settle for", the surely schedule available would be those like your self who look to think of that a man or woman's sexual orientation pertains to how nicely a man or woman can do a job. it relatively is not any diverse that the mindset that stored women human beings from particular jobs and positions interior the protection rigidity. 0.33 and maximum heavily, the morality of yet another's sexual existence with a consenting grownup isn't your decision to make for individuals. except a greater 0.5 a protection rigidity man or woman unearths out and needs to divorce an untrue man or woman, there are no protection rigidity rules that brush off that man or woman from accountability. Homosexuality could be no diverse. in case you stand with %., you stand with bigotry.
2016-11-14 06:54:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think its an agenda.
But then again, when my family supported women's suffrage in the early 1900s, they didn't think of it as being a matter of agendas. When they helped run the Underground Railroad in the 1850s and then some of them fought in the civil war -- they didn't think of it as an agenda. When they fought in the Revolution they also didn't think of that as a matter of agendas.
They thought of it as freedom for all, equality, and decency.
That's pretty much how I think of gay rights.
Good day.
Reynolds Jones
Schenectady, NY
http://www.rebuff.org
2006-06-06 08:05:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the heterosexual agenda is being forced down our throat. I would say the right wing religous agenda is being forced down everyone's throat. Hitler had the Jews and Bush has the gays. I guess every regime has some group to opress!
2006-06-06 02:20:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by anastasia_bevahousen 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can only talk for myself but...
the word gay was a lable put on homosexual people by heterosexual people. Homosexual people didnt adopt it on their own.
Parade on TV, do as i do and change the channel.
Do you not think that straight people force their ideals onto gay people... by wanting only straight education in schools, by saying that gay people shouldnt show affection to each other in public yet it is ok for straight people to do so.
this argument has 2 sides.
I dont mean to derail your question just show the other side.
2006-06-05 21:31:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋