English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-05 20:37:16 · 15 answers · asked by Antony 1 in News & Events Current Events

15 answers

Jeb Bush

2006-06-05 20:39:21 · answer #1 · answered by mrsingu 3 · 0 0

I sincerely hope its is not a Clinton or a Bush. We've had enough of those 2 families. And please God, don't let a Kennedy run.

Let me start out by responding to porkchops statement about Condi being a "token". Although porkchop says that is not intended to be racist, it was. And you should be ashamed for saying it. In fact you would probably say that about any black person serving under any president because you think anyone that would appoint a black person to such a position is doing it for show. Porkchop would never think Bush might have appointed Condi or Colin because they were the right persons for the job...oh no!!!!! They were tokens, in Porkchops racist mind. You discust me.

Next. All the people that want Bakac Bamas (sorry about the spelling) for president. Why? What does he stand for? Is he just a good looking guy or do you have a reason for saying he would make a good president? What has he done? Is he a leader or a politician? Say something about the man next time, dont just say he's the best. Give us a little bit to go on, please.

Finally who do I think the next president will be? I have no idea, really. I think Hillary has too many skeletons in her closet, and she makes too many political mistakes. She is not as smooth and crafty as Slick Willy. She'll run, and lose, I predict. John Kerry will run, and lose. Al Gore will probably run, and if he does he'll probably get the nomination (democratic). He'll lose. Republicans: Condi probably wont run. That leaves John McCain...lord help us all. That man has the weirdest friggin shaped face i've ever seen. A deformed jaw with a turkey neck. And he's about as corrupt and politically unstable as any democrat. I dont like him, but he has the best chance of winning. So lets say we are living in hell, and Satan, Hillary, Kerry, Al Gore, and McCain were the candidates? I'd have to vote for Satan...sorry. The rest of them suck.

2006-06-06 06:39:36 · answer #2 · answered by jack f 7 · 0 0

Ho, ho...nice. Well, if I were a betting man, which I'm not, I'd be putting serious money down on Hillary VS Condi in '08. Cheney's not going to run; either his heart will finally give out; he'll shoot one too many people he hunts with, or he'll go back to Halliburton and reap the profits of their last five years' work. Most likely the latter.
Hillary Clinton running for the Demos is a given. After all, who else they got? Al Gore? John Kerry? Yeah, right. No...bleeding heart liberal she is, as crooked as herself and Mr Bill are, Hillary Clinton's got it LOCKED IN. Shoot, she could even make Bill her VP, not just a First Husband! That is, if he can stop getting sucked off by the interns...
I seriously do think Condi Rice is going to run for the GOP. Again, who else they got? Jeb Bush, supposedly? Gimme a break...I seriously think after everything his older brother has f'd up in the last five years the American people in general really do think the Bush family has worn out their welcome in the White House. I mean, John McCain's alright, but he strikes me as being a GOP version of KERRY. In short, a fence sitter and a flip flopper. He's good at telling people what they want to hear, which makes him an excellent politician. That does not necessarily make you a good President...you really need friends in high places to get that far, and I don't think McCain has those. Condi Rice has said before she has no interest in being President. Fair enough. I mean, I've always said that she's the token woman in the Bush administration (since Powell left she's the token Black as well, and these statements are NOT meant to be racist or chauvinistic...I'm only telling it like it is, folks) and is merely another neo-con mouthpiece. Maybe so...but considering who she works with, she's had some good teachers. She's one of the few people in the administration with any charisma, which is why she'd be a GOP shoo-in for the nomination.
So, as an interested Canadian observer, that's my take on it. And if it came down to Hillary VS Condi, my money would go on Condi. For one thing, she has less enemies (both personal and public.) For another, her whole freaking career has been based in international relations, a must have if you want to be President (which is one of Dubya's many failures, c'mon now). I mean, Condi has been there and done that. She has maybe half of Hillary Clinton's ambition, but that is probably an asset. All that, and Condi Rice could kill two "Firsts" with one stone!

2006-06-06 04:30:34 · answer #3 · answered by J.A.R. 3 · 0 0

Barack Obama

2006-06-06 03:41:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clinton can't be president again. Personally, I am hoping for a Sen. Barak Obama.

2006-06-06 03:41:39 · answer #5 · answered by jess 2 · 0 0

Please believe there are more to choose from than these three-- its like Larry, Moe or Curly! Cheney or Rice, we are doomed, Clinton- still doomed but at least we may be entertained.

2006-06-06 04:05:05 · answer #6 · answered by dracomullet 4 · 0 0

None of the above. I like Tom Tancredo the best, and also like Mitt Romney.

2006-06-06 03:39:46 · answer #7 · answered by Kev 5 · 0 0

Cheney isn't running first off. And as long as its a republican it doesn't matter. Democrats don't know what they are ever talkin' about.

2006-06-06 03:39:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None of the above

2006-06-06 03:41:35 · answer #9 · answered by HeavyRain 4 · 0 0

Although I'm as anti Republican as I can be....The Democrats better come up with some better options because McCain is starting to look good to me.

2006-06-06 03:41:17 · answer #10 · answered by djmantx 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers