Who would vote for a lady for President of the USA? And Why?

Answer 1

A woman would never win an election for US President. Stop watching so much Gina Davis on television. It will never happen. And we certainly don't want Hilary Clinton in there if we ever got a female there!

Answer 2

To be completely honest, I’m a little hesitant right at this juncture. A few years ago would have been fine & a few years from now would be also, but while engrossed in a war against the extremist branch of traditional Islam, and needing to have a President who can buddy up with moderate Islamic leaders & make them look stronger. Well, I am a bit hesitant is all.

But yes, I could for sure. I'm a republican & personally I'd like to see us elect a woman or minority before democrats, cause I'm real tired of us being thought of as racist or chauvinist or anything else-ist that we’re very much not-ist. There are a handful of qualified folks on both sides, and of course I’d vote for the person who supports my views & can best do the job. If that can be a woman, then I’m all for it. I always notice that women are more against this then men though, why is that? I mean I dated some pretty psycho mood swingin girls before, but seriously.

Answer 3

We have a woman as Secretary of State (for the second time), which by the way is a job which involves quite a bit of face to face time with these tough Islamic leaders you're all so concerned about.

You're saying that because we're dealing with countries who don't allow women in power, that we ought to just send the menfolk? Tell me what the difference is between politically veiling our women and physically veiling them. I have a problem with caving in to those types of values.

I would vote for the person I felt would do the best job. Unfortunately, that would never be Condi Rice, who seems to be one of the women best positioned to run... as much as I'd like to see a woman in office (to put an end to all this idiocy about whether we could elect one), I couldn't vote for someone I disagreed with just because she's a woman. Gender is utterly irrelevant. It has to be.

Answer 4

Most are smarter than men and she'd have all the world leaders wrapped around her little finger.

Really, why not! It won't be that woman from Florida who is running for congress that stole the election though, or Rice. See how tired she looks lately?

They are also inclined to be fairer I think, though hearing some of the shrills on here you think Ann Coulter was doing all the posting!!

People can say what they want about Clinton. She has more brains in her little finger.

While Bush was drunk and getting a C- at Yale. sen Clinton was:

After completing high school in 1965, Rodham enrolled at Wellesley College in Massachusetts where she became active in politics, serving, for a time, as President of the Wellesley College Chapter of the College Republicans. During her junior year at Wellesley in 1968, Rodham was affected by the death of the civil rights leader Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., whom she had met in person in 1962 [9]. After attending the Wellesley in Washington program at the urging of Professor Alan Schechter, her political views became more liberal and she joined the Democratic Party. Having been named valedictorian of her graduating class at Wellesley, Rodham graduated in 1969 with departmental honors in Political Science. She became the first student in the history of Wellesley College to deliver a commencement address when she spoke at her own graduation [10]. Her speech received a standing ovation and she was featured in an article published by Life magazine [11].

In 1969, Rodham entered Yale Law School where she served on the Board of Editors of Yale Review of Law and Social Action and worked with underprivileged children at the Yale-New Haven Hospital. During the summer of 1970, she was awarded a grant to work at the Children's Defense Fund in Cambridge,

Answer 5

Just going by that? I would have to say no.

I dont vote based on what i see before me, i vote on their views and what they stand for. Same thing goes with the supposed "Party" system. I dont consider myself a democrat or republican just besause its stupid, people vote on what party someone is and that is nonsense.

People need to look into the candidates a bit more and not be swayed by such pithy things as partys or even those stupid ads that the candidates put on tv.

Answer 6

When the right woman comes along, I will. I'm not going to vote for someone just because she's a woman.
There have been many capable female leaders throughout history. It's just plain stupid to think someone can't handle the job, because of their gender.

Answer 7

If she was qualified. But I would vote for a woman just because she was a woman. There is a little bit of bias because I am a woman ... but I would vote for the best candidate.

Answer 8

I would. It would mainly depend on whether I agree with her political positions on key issues like abortion and gay marriage. If I agreed with her, and felt that of all the candidates I had to choose from she was most likely to fight for the things I believe in, she would have my vote.

Answer 9

I would if she was qualified! I think Hillary would make a better President than George Bush!

Answer 10

I can't because I'm not eligible to vote there but I hope Hilary wins, not because I think she'll be any good, but just to see those rednecks choke on their grits.