It'll take a lot to pass it into law, but with courts all over defining marriage as they so please, we may have no choice but to pass this ammendment.
2006-06-05 18:26:27 · 4 answers · asked by chicagoan86 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It would just be removed 20 years later like when blacks wern't allowed to marry, and then they were.
2006-06-05 18:34:36 · answer #1 · answered by Frenchman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as far as passing soon i can hope but i doubt it will it is a union like anyother. and if people are happy why not let them have peice of paper. it will change nothing in there lives. Gay people both male and female wear rings and have ceremony's just like strait people do the only thing that is missing is one person getting to change there name (easily) and that paper. i say let it pass if for no other reason its not going to keep them from doing what they want to. america is the land of choices and if they are going to "stay gay" let them be the way they are! who are we to talk away someones freedom!!!!!!!!! That violates our consitutional right.
And about the guy that said why not blacks were not allowed to marry.... uhmm your a dumb ****. blacks could marry just not out of their "kind" instead they were allowed to marry and breed so farmers could have more people to tourcher, rape and humiliate. they were not allowed to read or vote or drink out the white mans water fountains but they could marry. (in a christen ceremony) but thats yet another thing that christians have forced upon people.... and a whole other topic.....
2006-06-05 18:47:13 · answer #2 · answered by ksuccubis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
0%
They are only doing this to bring out the religious base of the party, they know it will not pass.
2006-06-05 23:12:02 · answer #3 · answered by MP US Army 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
due to high opposition from liberal groups , slim at this time.
2006-06-05 18:31:49 · answer #4 · answered by madman2k111428 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋