should pornography be considered a socially negative job or an expression of individual liberty?

Question

i asked this question because i strongly feel that the people in this industry must not be into their jobs emotionally but its just the financial aspects.and i also believe that emotionless sex almost always takes one towards harrassment-sexual,physical or both.also social and emotional.i know laws r there but its my query nonetheless:-)

Answer 1

Well, porn is really government regulated entertainment. Congress makes the laws that say what can and cannot be depicted. Not very liberating in my opinion. Sex is way oversold here in America and what passes for porn here is really boring to say the least.

Really who wants to watch overpaid professionals fake sex? many social mores will have to change here before porn has anything really liberating to offer. Maybe in a couple of hundred years or so.

Answer 2

we can consider pornography as an expression of individual liberty but to conservatives it will always remain a politically incorrect job.

Answer 3

An expression of individual liberty.

Answer 4

Socially negative I guess, but hard to stamp out, like air pollution. Maybe the government should sell tradable rights to produce it, like with pollution.

Answer 5

Is there some reason why it can't be considered both?

Answer 6

both. not all things that we can do or are allowed to do are helpful, good or positive

Answer 7

if engaged in willingly, it is both